• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Talking about the Revolution? The Place of Marxist Theory in the Core Course Curriculum of US Undergraduate Degree-Granting Women's Studies Programs.
【24h】

Talking about the Revolution? The Place of Marxist Theory in the Core Course Curriculum of US Undergraduate Degree-Granting Women's Studies Programs.

机译：谈论革命？马克思主义理论在美国授予学位的女性研究课程的核心课程中的位置。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

From the key role that socialist feminists (who use some Marxist theoretical concepts) played in organizing many of the first academic women's studies programs (Kennedy 2008) to the central explorations of questions both with and against Marx in feminist theory, Marxist and Marxist feminist theory historically held a visible and vital place in the field. However since the introduction of post-theories to the humanities and social sciences in the late twentieth century, Marxist feminists charge that women's studies has abandoned Marx completely (Ebert 1995, Kelly 2002, Cotter 2007, Gimenez 2010) while some socialist feminists charge that Marxist theory is built into contemporary feminist theory in concepts such as "globalization" and "anti-racism" even if we don't call it "Marxist" (Gardiner 2008). So, who is correct? What is the place of Marxist theory in academic women's studies today?;Within the social and cultural foundations of education, one way to explore these questions is to analyze which theories and concepts are core to the field's undergraduate curriculum---to determine what women's studies is teaching in its core courses. Since introduction to women's studies and feminist theory comprise the field's core courses (Salley, Winkler, Celeen, & Meck 2004), a representative sample of current in-use syllabi from these courses was collected from across the US. The most frequently assigned core course authors and titles are established. A descriptive and deductive content analysis is performed as each of the most frequently assigned course readings is run through the Marxist Theory Filter, comprised of the theory's key components, in order to determine which, if any, of these core course readings are Marxist.;The study supports the assertions of Marxist feminists and finds that Marxist theory is not only marginalized, but is nearly invisible in the core curriculum; and post-theories, particularly multicultural, global and postcolonial feminist theories that utilize intersectionality theory, clearly dominate. The hegemonic presence of post-theories in the undergraduate core curriculum has significant implications for those who believe that a discipline needs a diverse knowledge base, for those interested in protecting academic freedom and for those who think that one of the only academic fields founded on questions of equality and liberation should continue to concern itself with social change. I propose a re-introduction of Marxist and Marxist feminist theory into the academic women's studies core curriculum as a means of both ensuring a diverse knowledge base and re-establishing a commitment to social change.
机译：从社会主义女权主义者（使用某些马克思主义理论概念）在组织许多首批学术女性研究计划（肯尼迪2008）中扮演的关键角色，到对女权主义理论，马克思主义和马克思主义女权主义理论中支持和反对马克思的问题的集中探索从历史上看，它在该领域占有举足轻重的地位。然而，自从二十世纪末期将后理论引入人文科学和社会科学以来，马克思主义女权主义者指责女性研究已完全摒弃了马克思（Ebert 1995，Kelly 2002，Cotter 2007，Gimenez 2010），而一些社会主义女权主义者则指责马克思主义即使在我们不称其为“马克思主义”的情况下，“女权主义”理论还是在诸如“全球化”和“反种族主义”之类的概念中被纳入当代女性主义理论的（Gardiner 2008）。那么，谁是正确的？马克思主义理论在当今女性大学研究中的地位是什么？；在教育的社会和文化基础内，探索这些问题的一种方法是分析哪些理论和概念是该领域本科课程的核心-以确定什么女性研究是其核心课程中的教学。由于介绍女性研究和女权主义理论构成了该领域的核心课程（Salley，Winkler，Celeen和Meck 2004），因此从美国各地收集了这些课程中当前使用中的教学大纲的代表性样本。确定最频繁分配的核心课程作者和职务。在对每个最频繁分配的课程阅读材料进行马克思主义理论过滤时，将进行描述性和演绎性内容分析，该理论过滤器由该理论的关键组成部分组成，以确定哪些（如果有的话）是马克思主义。该研究支持马克思主义女权主义者的主张，发现马克思主义理论不仅被边缘化了，而且在核心课程中几乎是看不见的。后理论，尤其是利用交叉性理论的多元文化，全球和后殖民女性主义理论，显然占据了主导地位。后理论在本科核心课程中的霸权地位对那些认为一门学科需要多元化知识基础的人们，对保护学术自由感兴趣的人们以及认为以问题为基础的唯一学术领域之一的人们具有重大意义。平等和解放的观念应继续关注社会变革。我提议将马克思主义和马克思主义女性主义理论重新引入学术女性研究的核心课程，以确保既有多样化的知识基础又能重新确立对社会变革的承诺。

著录项

  • 作者

    Daugherty, Jacqueline D.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Cincinnati.;

  • 授予单位 University of Cincinnati.;
  • 学科 Education Sociology of.;Womens Studies.;Education Social Sciences.;Education Higher.;Education Leadership.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2012
  • 页码 108 p.
  • 总页数 108
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号