• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Public sentiment on immigrants and immigration policies in central and eastern Europe. A cross -national multilevel analysis.
【24h】

Public sentiment on immigrants and immigration policies in central and eastern Europe. A cross -national multilevel analysis.

机译：公众对中欧和东欧移民和移民政策的看法。跨国多层次分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The intensity of negative orientations toward immigrants and immigration in the post-communist European states is puzzling, as foreigners' presence is less visible than in Western Europe and has yet to become politicized. Thus, the crucial question that arises is: How different are the ex-socialist publics in their representations of immigrants and immigration policies among themselves and, taken together, compared to Western Europe? To answer this, I draw on and extend the existing theoretical and empirical contributions on prejudice and national identity by proposing a model which incorporates both individual and contextual factors. Using data from the 1995 module of International Social Survey Programme and a set of macro-level indicators, I conduct country-based and cross-national multilevel analyses in the two European regions, separate and combined. Education, nativism, chauvinism, regime legitimacy and protectionism are the strongest individual-level predictors in both regions, despite dissimilar patterns of effects. Rightist party affiliation fails to explain attitudinal variation across the nine post-communist countries, but subjective class does. At the macro-level, politico-economic history separates the four Visegrad Group member-states from other transitional countries and the concurrence of unemployment rate and proportional presence of foreigners emerges as a consistent predictor in both regions. Testing for differential effects reveals that micro-level factors have weaker influences in the ex-socialist states than in Western Europe, but the post-communist publics are characterized to higher extent by a long-run self-interest rooted in notions of threat and rational calculations. An inter-regional comparison further suggests that contextual factors play a heightened role in explaining the dispersion of attitudes toward immigrants and immigration policies in the Central and Eastern European countries.
机译：后共产主义的欧洲国家对移民和移民的负面倾向的程度令人困惑，因为外国人的存在不如西欧明显，并且尚未政治化。因此，出现的关键问题是：与西欧相比，前社会主义公众在他们之间的移民代表和移民政策代表上有何不同？为了回答这个问题，我通过提出一个结合了个体和背景因素的模型，来借鉴和扩展现有对偏见和民族认同的理论和经验贡献。利用1995年国际社会调查计划模块的数据和一系列宏观指标，我在两个欧洲地区分别进行了国家和跨国家的多层次分析。尽管影响方式不同，但教育，本土主义，沙文主义，政权合法性和保护主义是两个地区最强的个人层面的预测指标。右派政党的隶属关系不能解释整个九个后共产主义国家的态度差异，但是主观阶级却可以。在宏观层面上，政治经济史将维谢格拉德集团的四个成员国与其他转型国家区分开来，并且失业率和外国人比例存在的一致成为两个地区的一致预测指标。对差异影响的检验表明，微观因素在前社会主义国家中的影响要比西欧弱，但后共产主义公众的特征是，长期以来存在着以威胁和理性为根基的个人利益。计算。区域间的比较进一步表明，背景因素在解释中欧和东欧国家对移民和移民政策的态度分散方面起着重要作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ceobanu, Alin Mihai.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Sociology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 253 p.
  • 总页数 253
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号