• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The moral judgment of admission counselors at for-profit and not-for-profit, baccalaureate-degree-granting colleges and universities.
【24h】

The moral judgment of admission counselors at for-profit and not-for-profit, baccalaureate-degree-granting colleges and universities.

机译：营利性和非营利性，授予学士学位的大学和大学的招生顾问的道德判断。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Ethical behavior in the college admission counseling profession is becoming more important given the increasingly competitive higher education marketplace. The popularity of the for-profit university, online degrees, tuition discounting, and financial aid cuts add to this competitive environment. These changes coupled with a recent decision by the Department of Education on admission counselor compensation, is causing concern and division among education sectors. This study examines the moral judgment (a component of ethical behavior) of admission counselors working in for-profit and not-for-profit colleges and universities in the U.S.; James Rest created the Defining Issues Test (DIT) in 1974 to measure moral judgment as an alternative to the lengthy and subjective interviews done by Lawrence Kohlberg. The Defining Issues Test 2 (DIT2), as the updated version of the test, was used along with telephone interviews with members of the National Association for College Admission Counselors (NACAC) and a national, for-profit university to compare moral judgment scores ( n = 138). A p value of .05 was used in all statistical tests including t-tests, one-and two-factor ANOVA, and regression analysis. Comparisons to other professions show that admission counselors have a higher mean moral judgment score (P score) than the average adult population, lower scores than certain professions, and higher scores than other professions. Differences in moral judgment scores relating to employment at a for-profit or not-for-profit institution were found but were not significant.; Although several studies have found differences between moral judgment and age, gender, and educational level, this study shows no significant relationships between admission counselors and these variables. Further, no significant differences were found between the for-profit and not-for-profit colleges or university sectors studied. As the first study of this kind with the admission counseling profession, further studies are encouraged.
机译：鉴于竞争日益激烈的高等教育市场，高校招生咨询行业的道德行为正变得越来越重要。营利性大学的受欢迎程度，在线学位，学费折扣和经济援助削减，增加了这种竞争环境。这些变化，再加上教育部最近对入学辅导员补偿的决定，引起了教育部门的关注和分歧。这项研究调查了在美国营利性和非营利性大学中工作的招生顾问的道德判断（道德行为的组成部分）；詹姆斯·雷斯特（James Rest）于1974年创建了定义问题测验（DIT），以衡量道德判断，以代替劳伦斯·科尔伯格（Lawrence Kohlberg）进行的漫长而主观的访谈。定义问题测试2（DIT2）是该测试的更新版本，与美国大学招生顾问协会（NACAC）和一所全国性营利性大学的成员进行电话采访时进行了比较，以比较道德判断分数（ n = 138）。在包括t检验，一因素和两因素方差分析以及回归分析在内的所有统计检验中，p值为0.05。与其他专业的比较显示，招生顾问的平均道德判断得分（P score）比成人平均水平更高，比某些专业的得分低，并且比其他专业的得分高。发现与营利性或非营利性机构的就业有关的道德判断分数存在差异，但差异不大。尽管有几项研究发现道德判断与年龄，性别和教育程度之间存在差异，但这项研究表明招生顾问与这些变量之间没有显着关系。此外，研究的营利性和非营利性学院或大学部门之间没有发现显着差异。作为入学咨询行业的此类首次研究，我们鼓励进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号