• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The language of philosophy---a critical look into the language of early analytic philosophy.
【24h】

The language of philosophy---a critical look into the language of early analytic philosophy.

机译：哲学的语言-批判性地分析早期分析哲学的语言。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In my dissertation I offer a topical critique of the language of early analytic philosophy. My critique focuses on the factors that shaped the tradition's linguistic inventory. Among these factors, I pay special attention to the direct influence the new analytic arguments and methodologies had on the formation of the specialized language of analysis. In this, I argue that early analytic philosophy is not only distinguished by a tendency of economizing language, as early analytic thinkers readily admitted, but also by the heretofore unstudied effort to ostracize words and expressions that could in any way challenge their new philosophical programs. I attempt to prove that, in result of the latter, early analytic philosophers isolated themselves from alternative ways of doing philosophy and, more importantly, sacrificed some of the understandability of their arguments. My method consists of the analysis of specific arguments by particular philosophers with a view on both the formation of their language choices and the way these choices in turn influence the arguments themselves. My primary examples of the tendencies discussed come from the writings of Moore, Neurath, and Wittgenstein. I also look into the importance of professional conformism for the way the language of early analytic philosophy has been inherited by subsequent generations of analysts. My example here is Searle and, more specifically, his compromised treatment of Derrida's reading of Austin. In conclusion, I explore the issues of language choice, understandability of arguments, modes of inheritance, and philosophical motivation as discussed by Wisdom and Cavell. In the latter two philosophers, I find both eloquent proof for the relevance of the problems that concern my study and, also, fresh suggestions as to how these problems are to be dealt with philosophically.
机译：在我的论文中，我对早期分析哲学的语言进行了局部评论。我的批评集中在影响传统语言清单的因素上。在这些因素中，我特别关注新的分析论证和方法论对专业分析语言形成的直接影响。在本文中，我认为早期分析哲学不仅以早期分析思想家容易接受的节省语言的倾向为特征，而且还以迄今尚未研究的排斥词和表达的努力而著称，这可能以任何方式挑战他们的新哲学程序。我试图证明，由于后者的存在，早期的分析哲学家将自己与其他哲学方法相隔离，更重要的是，牺牲了他们的论点的可理解性。我的方法包括由特定哲学家对特定论点进行分析，并同时考虑他们的语言选择的形成以及这些选择反过来影响论点本身的方式。我所讨论的趋势的主要例子来自摩尔，诺伊拉特和维特根斯坦的著作。我还探讨了专业顺从性对于早期分析哲学的语言已被后代分析家所继承的方式的重要性。我在这里的例子是塞尔（Searle），更具体地说，他对德里达（Derrida）读奥斯丁（Austin）的妥协。总之，我探讨了由Wisdom和Cavell讨论的语言选择，论点的可理解性，继承方式以及哲学动机等问题。在后两个哲学家中，我既雄辩地证明了与我的研究有关的问题的相关性，也找到了关于如何从哲学上解决这些问题的新建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ventzislavov, Rossen.;

  • 作者单位

    City University of New York.;

  • 授予单位 City University of New York.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.;Language General.;History Modern.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 271 p.
  • 总页数 271
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号