• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Public interest and technological rationality social determinants of American broadcasting, 1920--1927.
【24h】

Public interest and technological rationality social determinants of American broadcasting, 1920--1927.

机译：美国广播的公共利益和技术合理性社会决定因素，1920--1927年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study aims to prove how and why the principle of the “public interest” in American broadcasting came to be as it was; and what it meant in given social, economic, and political conditions. The study examines the competition between three major actors—the Commerce Department, the radio industry, and the public sector—over the meaning of public interest and its operation in the four thematic policy areas of citizen access and structural conditions; technological rationality; antimonopoly; and programming. This examination pays attention to the ideological complexity of the public interest, which retains the historical legacy of republican collectivism and classical liberal legal reasoning; and requires a distinction between the normative meaning of the public interest principle and its actual operation for structuring American radio broadcasting.; First, this study demonstrates that each of these three sectors uses the public interest differently corresponding to certain conditions and intentions of broadcasting policy-making, thus, revealing the undefined, unsettled nature of the public interest. The unsettled nature of the public interest allows each sector to project its own visions and interpretations onto the language and enables the language to become a primary legal standard. Second, it argues that to smooth out the inevitable conflicts created by the ideological discrepancies and regulatory operation of the public interest, technological rationality came into play and redefined the meaning of the public interest and its applications overtime. Third, this study reveals that the public sector interpreted the public interest in the moral vision of the collective good, attempting to institutionalize a public control model of national radio. Although the public sector's struggles demonstrate the potential of the public interest as a strong foundation for institutionalizing public rights of the airwaves, its failure proves that merely imposing normative obligations for commercial broadcasters was insufficient.; Based on this finding, finally, the study suggests the revision of our understanding of the public interest in favor of a critical conception for establishing a democratic communications system. A critical approach to the public interest recognizes the public as mobilized political power, and aims to expand the public good beyond a pluralistic understanding of interest.
机译：这项研究旨在证明美国广播中“公共利益”原则如何以及为什么变得如此。以及在给定的社会，经济和政治条件下的含义。该研究考察了三个主要参与者之间的竞争：商务部，广播业和公共部门，这些竞争是在公众获取和结构条件这四个主题政策领域中公共利益的含义及其运作。技术合理性；反垄断和编程。这项检查关注公共利益的意识形态复杂性，保留了共和主义集体主义和古典自由法律推理的历史遗产；并要求在公共利益原则的规范含义与其构成美国无线电广播的实际操作之间进行区分。首先，这项研究表明，这三个部门在广播政策制定的某些条件和意图方面各自使用公共利益的方式有所不同，因此揭示了公共利益的不确定性和不确定性。公共利益的不确定性使每个部门都可以将自己的愿景和解释投射到该语言上，并使该语言成为主要的法律标准。其次，它认为，为消除公共利益的意识形态差异和监管运作所造成的不可避免的冲突，技术合理性发挥了作用，并重新定义了公共利益的含义及其随时间的应用。第三，这项研究表明，公共部门在集体利益的道德视野中解释了公共利益，试图使国家广播的公共控制模式制度化。尽管公共部门的斗争证明了将公共利益作为使电波公共权利制度化的坚实基础的潜力，但其失败证明仅对商业广播公司施加规范义务是不够的。最后，基于此发现，该研究建议对我们对公共利益的理解进行修订，以支持建立民主传播系统的批判概念。对公共利益的批判性方法承认公众是动员的政治权力，旨在将公共利益扩大到对利益的多元化理解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Baek, Misook.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Iowa.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Iowa.;
  • 学科 Mass Communications.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 344 p.
  • 总页数 344
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 传播理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号