• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Lost in Development: Modernization, Urban Planning and Heritage Preservation in Quanzhou.
【24h】

Lost in Development: Modernization, Urban Planning and Heritage Preservation in Quanzhou.

机译：在发展中迷失：泉州的现代化，城市规划和文物保护。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This research studies the changing spatial politics from the traditional to the modern state, and the factors that affect the form of space in Quanzhou's different historical stages. The central questions are: how have spatial politics led to the changes of local culture; in what ways have the local residents had their own right to the city and how have they reacted to the state's spatial politics?;Quanzhou is a medium-size ancient city in Fujian, and as with other old cities in China today, its urban space became the arena of negotiation between different local and global social forces and the state. There is also great deal of politics and ambiguity around the concepts of "cultural heritage", and "modernization".;In order to explore the changing spatial politics and the changing ideas of "right to the city", I look in particular at how different ideologies have been used in different historical periods in planning the city, as well as the practices that led to spatial change. Using Henri Lefebvre's theory of the "right to the city", I suggest three dimensions in observing the right to the city, namely, the right to settle, the right to be different from the "modern city", and the right to keep the structure of meaning with regards to daily life and local space. By examining historical materials and using field work data, I show how "the right to the city" was ignored by the central and local governments during the planning process. I point out that the state always acts as the main factor that shapes the space of the city. The urban planning process was affected by the change of spatial politics, the politics of heritage, and the production of space from the state. Despite this, residents' daily lives help to shape the structure of meaning between their lives and their local space. Thus, the local residents have been able to find their own space in the city.
机译：这项研究研究了空间政治从传统状态向现代状态的转变，以及影响泉州不同历史阶段空间形态的因素。中心问题是：空间政治如何导致当地文化的变化；当地居民以何种方式对城市拥有自己的权利，以及他们对国家的空间政治有何反应？；泉州是福建中型古城，与今天的中国其他旧城一样，其城市空间成为地方和全球不同社会力量与国家之间进行谈判的舞台。关于“文化遗产”和“现代化”的概念也有很多政治上和含糊不清的地方；为了探讨不断变化的空间政治和不断变化的“城市权”的观念，我特别关注如何在不同的历史时期，城市规划使用了不同的意识形态，以及导致空间变化的做法。我使用亨利·勒费弗尔（Henri Lefebvre）的“城市权”理论，建议在观察城市权的三个方面，即定居权，与“现代城市”不同的权利以及保持城市权利的权利。关于日常生活和当地空间的意义结构。通过检查历史资料并使用现场工作数据，我展示了中央和地方政府在规划过程中如何忽略“城市权”。我指出，国家始终是塑造城市空间的主要因素。城市规划过程受到空间政治，遗产政治和国家空间生产变化的影响。尽管如此，居民的日常生活仍有助于塑造他们的生活与当地空间之间的意义结构。因此，当地居民已经能够在城市中找到自己的空间。

著录项

  • 作者

    Luo, Pan.;

  • 作者单位

    The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;

  • 授予单位 The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;
  • 学科 Anthropology Cultural.;Cultural Resources Management.;Urban and Regional Planning.;History Asia Australia and Oceania.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2011
  • 页码 238 p.
  • 总页数 238
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号