• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Beyond the hegemony of universalist models: East Asian dynamism and a critique of economic development paradigms.
【24h】

Beyond the hegemony of universalist models: East Asian dynamism and a critique of economic development paradigms.

机译：超越普遍主义模式的霸权：东亚活力和对经济发展范式的批判。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This dissertation critically analyzes the debates on economic development of the last sixty years. One of the aims is to demonstrate the inadequacy of the methodological and epistemological premises on which different interpretations of development have been constructed and to demystify the traditional image of development.; This work challenges the universalist and Eurocentric assumptions of the national development model of the 1950s and 1960s, based on industrialization and modernization. It especially criticizes its modernization variant, which assumed socio-economic change as a unidirectional and progressive path of stages necessary for all societies. It puts also into question the premises of the universalist models contructed after the crisis of the 1970s, that is, of the neoliberal, statist, and cultural interpretations. What is contested is the fragmentation of knowledge priviliging a single aspect of the development process with the pretension of explaining its complexity through universal laws disregarding geopolitical, conjunctural, and historical dynamics.; In pursuing the object of a unitary knowledge of the world, and therefore of a different line of inquiry, this research proposes a world-systems theoretical framework and analytical tools to study the complexity of the development process in its totality.; The peculiarities of East Asian economic dynamism interpreted in a world-system framework are taken as a cue to challenge the ahistorical and reductionist assumptions of the conventional literature. In the framework of this study, "development," structurally, is not possible for all. It cannot be generalized, and the examples of economic success are rather exceptional. The transformation of the Asian economy constitutes one of these exceptions of upward mobility in the oligarchic structure of wealth of the capitalist world-economy and took place because of an exceptional combination of circumstances that can be understood only if analyzed in a broader historical, systemic and regional context.
机译：本文对近六十年来有关经济发展的争论进行了批判性的分析。目的之一是证明在建立不同的发展解释的方法论和认识论前提方面的不足，并使传统的发展形象神秘化。这项工作挑战了基于工业化和现代化的1950年代和1960年代国家发展模式的普遍主义和以欧洲为中心的假设。它特别批评它的现代化变体，该变体将社会经济变化视为所有社会必需的单向进步阶段。它也对1970年代危机后建构的普遍主义模型的前提，即新自由主义，国家主义和文化解释的前提提出了质疑。争论的焦点是知识的分散化，使发展过程的一个方面处于劣势，并倾向于通过无视地缘政治，宪法和历史动态的普遍规律来解释其复杂性。为了追求世界统一知识的目标，并因此寻求不同的研究方向，本研究提出了一个世界系统的理论框架和分析工具，以研究整个发展过程的复杂性。在世界体系框架中解释的东亚经济活力的特殊性被认为是对传统文献的历史和还原主义假设的挑战。在这项研究的框架中，不可能从结构上“发展”所有人。它不能一概而论，经济成功的例子是相当例外的。亚洲经济的转型是资本主义世界经济财富的寡头结构中向上流动的例外之一，其发生是由于特殊情况的结合，只有在更广泛的历史，系统和广泛的分析中才能理解。区域背景。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bilotti, Edvige.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Binghamton.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Binghamton.;
  • 学科 Sociology Theory and Methods.; Sociology Social Structure and Development.; Economics Theory.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 281 p.
  • 总页数 281
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会学理论与方法论;社会结构和社会关系;经济学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号