• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >From over-integration to asset specificity: The organizational change of a state-owned machinery enterprise in Guangzhou (China, Chinese text).
【24h】

From over-integration to asset specificity: The organizational change of a state-owned machinery enterprise in Guangzhou (China, Chinese text).

机译：从过度整合到资产专用化：广州一家国有机械企业的组织变革（中国，中文）。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The twenty-year economic reform in China has witnessed frequent changes in the titles and structures of China's economic organizations. This case study investigates the internal organizational form of a state-owned enterprise in Guangzhou, China. It depicts the history of its organizational form from 1949 to 2000. Under the planned economy, the said enterprise, The Southern Heavy Machinery Corporation, had an over-integrated organizational structure. From 1994 to 2000, the enterprise has set up a system consisting of an enterprise group corporation and dozens of subsidiary companies, moving toward a market system for its internal transactions among the production units. The subsidiary companies were set up on the basis of the earlier production plants established before 1984. As profits decreased year by year, the new general manager who started his tenure in September 2000 made the decision to bring some of its crucial subsidiary companies back into the form of production plants to render stronger continuities in production.; Why then, after 16 years of internal market practice that has begun in 1984, did the enterprise restructure itself to adopt the unitary form (U form) in some crucial production units? This study aims to explain the following questions: what was the cause of adopting the certain organizational form, why it used the internal market system and why the internal market system failed.; In the institutional approach, the studies of organizational forms have long been influenced by two theories: efficiency theory and power theory. The general theoretical concern of this study is: Is efficiency theory adequate to explain the internal organizational form? Which of these two theories is more appropriate to explain the internal organizational form of the state-owned enterprises in China?; I propose an integrative approach to address the above questions. My findings suggest that certain kinds of the organizational form were always interwoven with the social situation at the time and could not be simplistically explained in terms of efficiency alone. It was the state and the development of the market that determined the dynamics of the organizational form. In my opinion, efficiency theory, specifically the concept of asset specificity, could explain why the internal market system failed. On the other hand, power theory, specifically the phenomenon of isomorphism, could shed light on why the enterprise adopted the internal market system in 1994. The study suggests that the perspective of power has more strength to explain the social process of the organizational form framing. Furthermore, it explores the source of the internal transaction costs, which was underdeveloped in neo-institutional economic theory. It is my argument that there is a missing link between asset specificity and the internal transaction costs.
机译：在中国二十年的经济改革中，中国经济组织的头衔和结构不断变化。本案例研究调查了中国广州一家国有企业的内部组织形式。它描绘了其1949年至2000年组织形式的历史。在计划经济下，上述企业南方重型机械公司的组织结构过分整合。从1994年到2000年，企业建立了一个由企业集团公司和数十家子公司组成的系统，并朝着生产单位之间内部交易的市场体系迈进。子公司是在1984年之前建立的较早生产工厂的基础上成立的。由于利润逐年下降，新任总经理于2000年9月开始任职，他决定将其一些重要的子公司重新纳入生产。生产工厂的形式以增强生产的连续性。为什么在经过1984年开始的16年内部市场实践之后，企业在某些关键的生产单元中进行自身重组以采用单一形式（U形式）？本研究旨在解释以下问题：采用某种组织形式的原因是什么，为什么使用内部市场系统以及为什么内部市场系统失败。在制度方法中，组织形式的研究长期以来受到两种理论的影响：效率理论和权力理论。该研究的一般理论关注点是：效率理论是否足以解释内部组织形式？这两种理论中的哪一种更适合解释中国国有企业的内部组织形式？我提出一种综合方法来解决上述问题。我的发现表明，某些类型的组织形式总是与当时的社会状况交织在一起，不能仅凭效率简单地解释。市场的状态和发展决定了组织形式的动态。我认为，效率理论，特别是资产特定性的概念，可以解释内部市场体系为何失败。另一方面，权力理论，特别是同构现象，可以揭示为什么企业在1994年采用内部市场体系。研究表明，权力的观点具有更多的力量来解释组织形式框架的社会过程。 。此外，它还探讨了内部交易成本的来源，而这一点在新制度经济学理论中是不发达的。我的论点是资产专用性与内部交易成本之间缺少联系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ping, Ping.;

  • 作者单位

    Chinese University of Hong Kong (People's Republic of China).;

  • 授予单位 Chinese University of Hong Kong (People's Republic of China).;
  • 学科 Sociology Social Structure and Development.; Economics Commerce-Business.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 264 p.
  • 总页数 264
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会结构和社会关系;贸易经济;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号