• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Analysis of government strategies to achieve industrial competitiveness: A comparative case study of Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and China.
【24h】

Analysis of government strategies to achieve industrial competitiveness: A comparative case study of Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and China.

机译：政府实现产业竞争力战略的分析：日本，韩国，台湾和中国的比较案例研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The desire to understand the reasons behind high economic growth and increased manufacturing exports in East Asian countries has generated considerable debate and study of the strategies employed by East Asian governments. This study explores a general claim that there exists an Asian Model, typified by the Japanese government's strategy since the end of WWII to 1980, which has been followed by other East Asian governments to achieve remarkable economic performance. The Asian Model is characterized by strategies to promote high savings, high investment, education, industrial targeting, exports, and protection of home markets and industries.; This dissertation compares and contrasts government strategies adopted by Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and China. The Wheel-Spokes Model, developed by the author, is used as an analytical framework to conduct the comparative case study. It comprises six dimensions: industrial structure, investment, human resources, technology, market, and timing.; This study reveals that there are similarities but significant differences in strategies adopted by these four governments to pursue national industrial competitiveness. The study also finds that there is no single Asian Model followed by the case-study governments. Each government's strategies were unique to select industries and support a certain industry structure, open or close markets to foreign capital, target the level of technology, prepare human resources, set up market protection, and choose strategic timing to build its industrial competitiveness. These differences reflect public policy preferences by the case governments, and they lead to a different industrial strength and level of competitiveness for each case country.; The study recognizes the need for balance and consistency among the six major strategy areas represented by each dimension of the Wheel-Spokes Model in government strategy making. It makes recommendations for public policy initiatives and highlights the value of comparative studies in public policy and administration.
机译：渴望了解东亚国家经济高速增长和制造业出口增加的原因的愿望引起了对东亚政府采用的战略的大量辩论和研究。这项研究探索了一个普遍的主张，即存在着一种亚洲模式，其特征是自第二次世界大战以来至1980年日本政府的战略，其他东亚政府也纷纷效仿亚洲模式，以实现卓越的经济表现。亚洲模式的特征是促进高储蓄，高投资，教育，以工业为目标，出口以及保护本国市场和产业的战略。本文对日本，韩国，台湾和中国采取的政府战略进行了比较和比较。作者开发的轮辐模型被用作进行比较案例研究的分析框架。它包括六个维度：产业结构，投资，人力资源，技术，市场和时机。这项研究表明，这四个政府在追求国家产业竞争力方面所采用的策略存在相似之处，但存在重大差异。该研究还发现，案例研究型政府没有遵循单一的亚洲模式。各国政府的战略对于选择行业和支持一定的行业结构，对外资开放或关闭市场，确定技术水平，准备人力资源，建立市场保护以及选择战略时机以增强其行业竞争力来说都是独特的。这些差异反映了案例政府对公共政策的偏好，并导致每个案例国家不同的产业实力和竞争力水平。该研究认识到，在政府战略制定中，轮辐模型每个维度代表的六个主要战略领域之间需要保持平衡和一致。它为公共政策倡议提供建议，并强调比较研究在公共政策和行政管理中的价值。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chang, Yanru.;

  • 作者单位

    Florida Atlantic University.;

  • 授予单位 Florida Atlantic University.;
  • 学科 Political Science Public Administration.; Economics Commerce-Business.; History Asia Australia and Oceania.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 401 p.
  • 总页数 401
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;贸易经济;世界史;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号