首页> 外文学位 >Globalization and anarchy in cinema: Who wins and who loses in the entertainment war.
【24h】

Globalization and anarchy in cinema: Who wins and who loses in the entertainment war.

机译:电影的全球化与无政府状态:在娱乐战争中谁赢谁输。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

At the present time, the first stage towards a privatization of much of the world's audiovisual industries has begun. The official position vis-à-vis cinema taken by the United States during GATT and WTO international trade negotiations has made it quite clear that America's ambition is to break down and eliminate all trade barriers that have been put in place to protect and encourage national and regional cinema abroad. As media and communications industries in general are globalizing at a frenetic pace, more and more power is being concentrated in the hands of multinationals exemplified by recent mega-mergers between Internet, television, film, publishing and print media concerns which are, for the most part, run by white men educated in a Western, capitalist tradition. This situation has created animosity and a lack of trust as the cinema and the audiovisual industries outside of the United States do not necessarily view films and creative output as commodified products, but rather as part of a cultural tradition which is inseparable from art, history and national identity. Thus the American approach is viewed as hostile, especially as it attempts to force its point of view on others, with the primary motives being both profits and control of this increasingly important sector. As the lines between cinema and other aspects of cultural, educational, technological, political, national and even economic concerns become blurred, it is becoming increasingly important that no one single country or ideology be able to monopolize what we see and hear. The very word “entertainment” is misleading as cinema has always been about much more than just that, and thus what appears to be an economic battle (or, arguably a war) is, in fact, a struggle between competing ideologies and the souls and minds of our future generations.; I argue that a war is indeed taking place, in which there are both winners and losers, but that there are innovative forces at work trying to both resist and deconstruct the dominant Hollywood system. These are the forces of anarchy in cinema.
机译:目前,世界许多视听产业私有化的第一步已经开始。美国在关贸总协定和世贸组织国际贸易谈判中相对于电影院所持的官方立场已经很清楚地表明,美国的雄心是打破和消除为保护和鼓励国家利益而设置的所有贸易壁垒。国外地区电影。随着媒体和通信行业总体上以疯狂的速度全球化,越来越多的力量正集中在跨国公司的手中,最近互联网,电视,电影,出版和印刷媒体之间的大型合并就是最大的例子。部分是由受过西方资本主义传统教育的白人经营的。这种情况造成了敌意和缺乏信任,因为美国以外的电影和视听行业不一定将电影和创意产品视为商品化产品,而是作为与艺术,历史和文化密不可分的文化传统的一部分。国家身份。因此,美国的做法被认为是敌对的,特别是当它试图将自己的观点强加于他人时,其主要动机既是利润,也是对该日益重要部门的控制。随着电影与文化,教育,技术,政治,民族乃至经济问题的其他方面之间的界线变得模糊,任何一个国家或意识形态都无法垄断我们所看到和听到的东西,这一点变得越来越重要。 “娱乐”一词具有误导性,因为电影一向不仅仅局限于此,因此,实际上,一场经济战(或可以说是一场战争)似乎是竞争意识形态与灵魂之间的斗争。我们子孙后代的思想。我认为战争的确发生了,赢家和输家都有,但正在发挥创新力量,试图抵制和破坏主导的好莱坞体系。这些是电影中无政府状态的力量。

著录项

  • 作者

    Norris, Vivian Denise.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Washington.;

  • 授予单位 University of Washington.;
  • 学科 Cinema.; Mass Communications.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2001
  • 页码 556 p.
  • 总页数 556
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 电影、电视艺术;传播理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号