首页> 外文学位 >Relationships between personality dimensions assessed by the Navy Computer adaptive personality scales and supervisor ratings of job performance.
【24h】

Relationships between personality dimensions assessed by the Navy Computer adaptive personality scales and supervisor ratings of job performance.

机译:由海军计算机适应性人格量表评估的人格维度与工作绩效的主管评分之间的关​​系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Motowidlo, Borman, and Schmit (1997) proposed the theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. The theory posits that task performance is predicted by cognitive ability though task habits, skills, and knowledge, whereas contextual performance is predicted by personality through contextual habits, skills, and knowledge. In this study, their theory was tested with the use of the Armed Forces Qualification Test (AFQT) as a measure of cognitive ability, the Navy Rating Protocol (NRP) as a measure of task and contextual performance, and the Navy Computer Adaptive Personality Scales (NCAPS) as a measure of personality. NRP scales were divided into contextual and task performance dimensions and personality traits were hypothesized to predict contextual performance, whereas cognitive ability was hypothesized to predict task performance. Results showed that the AFQT was significantly predictive of all contextual performance dimensions, and many of the personality dimensions did not provide incremental validity. Personality was only able to provide incremental validity beyond the AFQT for two contextual dimensions. Furthermore, the AFQT was only predictive of one of the task performance dimensions hypothesized. Because results appear to be mixed, more research will need to be conducted on Motowidlo et al.'s theory of task and contextual performance in order to provide support for the theory.
机译:Motowidlo,Borman和Schmit(1997)提出了任务和情境绩效中个体差异的理论。该理论认为,任务绩效是由认知能力通过任务习惯,技能和知识预测的,而上下文绩效是由人格通过上下文习惯,技能和知识预测的。在这项研究中,他们的理论通过使用武装部队资格考试(AFQT)作为认知能力的度量标准,海军评估协议(NRP)作为任务和情境表现的度量标准以及海军计算机适应性人格量表进行了测试(NCAPS)作为衡量性格的指标。 NRP量表分为情境和任务绩效维度,并假设人格特质预测情境绩效,而假设认知能力则预测任务绩效。结果表明,AFQT可以很好地预测所有情境表现维度,而许多人格维度并不能提供递增的效度。在两个语境维度上,人格只能提供超出AFQT的递增效度。此外,AFQT只能预测假设的任务绩效维度之一。由于结果似乎是混合的,因此需要对Motowidlo等人的任务和情境表现理论进行更多研究,以便为该理论提供支持。

著录项

  • 作者

    Roland, Donna Kristina.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Memphis.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Memphis.;
  • 学科 Experimental psychology.;Personality psychology.;Occupational psychology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 62 p.
  • 总页数 62
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号