• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Assessing near work as a risk for myopia: The Better Evaluation of Eye Performance (BEEP) study.
【24h】

Assessing near work as a risk for myopia: The Better Evaluation of Eye Performance (BEEP) study.

机译：评估近距离工作有造成近视的风险：更好地评估眼力（BEEP）研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The two most common suggestions for the etiology of myopia are the genetic and the use-abuse hypotheses. To evaluate a use-abuse mechanism for the etiology of myopia, quantification of daily visual activities must be achieved. Although surveys, interviews and questionnaires have been used to answer this question, compliance and dependence on recall limit the use of these methods. A gold standard method for the quantification of near work does not currently exist. The purpose of this dissertation was to develop a method by which quantification of the nature, duration, and working distance of daily visual activities could be obtained in both adults and children.; The Experience Sampling Method was used to record visual activities of 63 optometry students and 31 children. Each subject was paged randomly throughout each testing period. Once paged, each subject completed a telephone voicemail survey and reported the nature, duration, working distance and visual correction worn during the visual task performed at the time of the page. The data were then transcribed into a log and categorized by type of activity.; The proportion of time spent doing near work (reading, writing, studying, computer use, or near hobbies) was 30.8% for adults and 25.0% for children 8 years of age and older. Eighteen subjects completed the testing on two occasions, six months apart, with different near work demands. A comparison of the percentage of near work between the first and second testing periods produced a significant difference in the amount of near work observed (mean difference = 13%, paired t-test, p = 0.001).; A comparison of data obtained using the Experience Sampling Method and that reported on a questionnaire showed agreement between methods for the proportion of time spent on computer use and household tasks (paired t-tests, p = 0.231 and 0.074, respectively). Significant differences in the proportion of time spent doing near hobbies, playing video games and watching television, doing distance activities, and in conversation were found between the two methods (paired t-tests, p = 0.007, 0.003, 0.0001, and 0.0001, respectively).; In conclusion, the Experience Sampling Method is an acceptable method for the quantification of near work in both adults and children.
机译：关于近视病因的两个最常见建议是遗传假说和滥用滥用假说。为了评估近视病因的滥用机制，必须实现日常视觉活动的量化。尽管通过调查，访谈和问卷调查的方式回答了这个问题，但依从性和对召回的依赖限制了这些方法的使用。目前尚无用于量化近功的金标准方法。本文的目的是开发一种方法，通过该方法可以对成年人和儿童的日常视觉活动的性质，持续时间和工作距离进行量化。经验抽样方法用于记录63名验光学生和31名儿童的视觉活动。在每个测试期间，每个受试者都被随机寻呼。翻页后，每个受试者完成一次电话语音邮件调查，并报告在翻页时执行的视觉任务过程中所经历的性质，持续时间，工作距离和视觉矫正。然后将数据记录到日志中，并按活动类型进行分类。成人从事工作（阅读，写作，学习，计算机使用或附近爱好）的时间比例为成人的30.8％和8岁及以上儿童的25.0％。 18名受试者两次完成测试，相隔六个月，分别完成不同的近距离工作需求。比较第一和第二个测试期间的近距离工作百分比，发现观察到的近距离工作量存在显着差异（平均差异= 13％，配对t检验，p = 0.001）。使用“经验抽样法”获得的数据与调查表中报告的数据进行比较，结果表明，计算机使用时间和家务劳动的方法之间存在一致性（配对t检验，分别为p = 0.231和0.074）。两种方法在配对嗜好，玩视频游戏和看电视，进行远程活动以及交谈中花费的时间比例存在显着差异（配对t检验，分别为p = 0.007、0.003、0.0001和0.0001）。 ）。总而言之，经验抽样方法是量化成人和儿童近距离工作的可接受方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jeandervin, Marjorie Kay.;

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Ophthalmology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2000
  • 页码 219 p.
  • 总页数 219
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 R770.1;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号