...
  • 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Pharmacists Association: JAPhA >Do community pharmacist performance evaluations capture the modern pharmacist’s role? Mapping competencies assessed in Canadian community pharmacy performance evaluation templates against the General Level Framework
【24h】

Do community pharmacist performance evaluations capture the modern pharmacist’s role? Mapping competencies assessed in Canadian community pharmacy performance evaluation templates against the General Level Framework

机译：社区药剂师绩效评估是否捕捉现代药剂师的角色？ 在加拿大社区药房绩效评估模板中评估的映射能力反对一般层面框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

ObjectivesFeedback on community pharmacists’ practice is limited after graduation and often comes in the form of annual performance evaluations by pharmacy managers based on company-provided templates. The objective of this study was to examine the relevance of these review processes to all aspects of community pharmacy practice. MethodsCompetencies evaluated in performance evaluation templates used by pharmacy organizations were mapped to the General Level Framework (GLF)—a tool developed to assess the competency of general-level pharmacy practitioners—and studied in hospital and community practice settings. The competencies were further assessed with consideration of their applicability to the current scope of practice of Canadian community pharmacy practice. ResultsPerformance evaluation templates from 7 community pharmacy organizations in Canada were obtained and evaluated. Performance evaluations mapped most closely to the GLF tool related to personal competencies (e.g., organization, communication, and teamwork), with the lowest level of congruence observed among competencies specific to patient care activities. Few evaluations considered recent expansions of scope in place across various Canadian provinces, such as ordering and interpreting laboratory tests or pharmacist prescribing. ConclusionPerformance evaluation can be a valuable tool to improve quality of care and the professional development of pharmacists; however, these tools should be reexamined to ensure that feedback on the most valuable aspects of a pharmacist’s professional practice is the focus. As pharmacy practice continues to evolve toward greater direct patient care activities, so too should our evaluation tools align with this increasingly recognized role.
机译：毕业后，社区药剂师的实践的目标留下的措施是有限的，并且往往以基于公司提供的模板的药房经理以年度绩效评估的形式。本研究的目的是审查这些审查流程对社区药房实践的各个方面的相关性。在制药组织使用的性能评估模板中评估的方法映射到制定的一般水平框架（GLF）-A工具，以评估一般级药房从业者的能力 - 以及在医院和社区练习环境中研究。通过审议他们对加拿大社区药学实践目前的实践范围的适用性进一步评估了能力。得到了加拿大7个社区药房组织的结果表达评估模板，并评估。绩效评估最密切地映射到与个人能力（例如，组织，沟通和团队合作）相关的GLF工具，在特定于患者护理活动的能力之间观察到的最低一致性。很少的评估考虑到各种加拿大省份的最近范围内的范围，例如订购和解释实验室测试或药剂师处方。结论性能评估可以是提高护理质量和药剂师专业发展的有价值的工具;但是，这些工具应重新审视，以确保反馈对药剂师专业实践的最有价值方面的反映是重点。由于药房实践继续发展到更大的直接患者护理活动，因此我们的评估工具应该与这种日益公认的作用保持一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号