• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Policy-making by administrative tribunals: A study of the manner in which the Ontario Municipal Board has applied provincial land use planning policies and has developed and applied its own planning policies.
【24h】

Policy-making by administrative tribunals: A study of the manner in which the Ontario Municipal Board has applied provincial land use planning policies and has developed and applied its own planning policies.

机译：行政法庭的政策制定：对安大略省市政委员会应用省级土地使用规划政策以及制定和应用自己的规划政策的方式进行研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The thesis is an empirical examination of one aspect of administrative decision-making, the manner in which tribunals develop and apply policy in the course of dealing with the matters under their jurisdiction. While regulatory theory suggests that it is the role of government to develop policy and of tribunals to apply that policy in specific situations, the relationship between the two is far more subtle. This is examined through the decision-making of one such tribunal, the Ontario Municipal Board, which plays a central role in land use planning in Ontario through its authority to review the planning decisions of municipal councils and committees.;The Board has regard to provincial planning policies where they exist, but regularly subordinates them to the application of its own policies where the two are in conflict. These latter policies, which emerge from the Board's decisions, deal with a wide range of both procedural and substantive land use planning matters. Its bedrock policy, derived from the common law of nuisance and reflecting its commitment to the protection of private property interests, is to protect private property from the adverse impacts of development. Yet it also accords importance to broader public interests in dealing with certain types. of applications, and develops policies beyond those mandated in the Planning Act to ensure full public participation in the planning process. This examination of the Board's policy-making role and of its treatment of provincial policies raises questions regarding the applicability of regulatory theories, the legitimacy of its activities and the need for retaining a planning review tribunal at all.
机译：本文对行政决策的一个方面进行了实证检验，这是法庭在处理其管辖范围内的事项时制定和运用政策的方式。虽然监管理论认为制定政策是政府的职责，而在特定情况下适用该政策是法庭的职责，但两者之间的关系要微妙得多。可以通过一个这样的法庭安大略省市政委员会的决策来进行审查，该委员会通过有权审查市议会和委员会的规划决定，在安大略省的土地使用规划中发挥着核心作用。在存在政策的情况下规划政策，但在两者发生冲突时定期将其服从于其自身政策的应用。后者的这些政策是从董事会的决定中产生的，涉及范围广泛的程序性和实质性土地使用规划事项。它的基石政策源于妨害普通法，体现了其对保护私有财产利益的承诺，旨在保护私有财产免受发展的不利影响。但是，在处理某些类型的事件时，它也更重要地符合更广泛的公共利益。申请，并制定超出《规划法》规定的政策的政策，以确保公众充分参与规划过程。对执董会决策角色及其对省级政策的处理方式的审查提出了有关监管理论的适用性，其活动的合法性以及是否需要保留规划审查法庭的问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chipman, John George.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Toronto (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 University of Toronto (Canada).;
  • 学科 Law.;Canadian Studies.;Urban and Regional Planning.;Political Science Public Administration.
  • 学位 S.J.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 373 p.
  • 总页数 373
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号