首页> 外文学位 >Strategies for the assessment of person -organization fit: Consolidating the unifying person-environment theme in counseling psychology.
【24h】

Strategies for the assessment of person -organization fit: Consolidating the unifying person-environment theme in counseling psychology.

机译:评估人与组织的策略:在咨询心理学中巩固统一的人与环境主题。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Person-organization fit---as a distinct construct within the person-environment fit realm---blends a number of counseling psychology's distinguishing themes in a rich, multi-disciplinary research arena. Measuring person-organization fit, however, is a complex endeavor. To date, the measurement effort has brought several competing methods, methods for which the proponents of each have engaged in rigorous debate. This dissertation addressed the debate by gathering fit data under a multi-method design using an identical organizational population across methods. Such a design expands upon the literature by integrating assessment methods into a more comprehensive means of capturing the essence of person-organization fit. Taking advantage of counseling psychology's broad-based focus on psychological assessment, both the quantitative and holistic angles of person-organization fit have been taken into account. Findings revealed that quantitative person-organization fit may look different across methods. Antecedents to person-organization fit were seen to have no effect. A holistic analysis of psychological themes showed that even with similar looking cultural patterns, person-organization fit when quantified can be influenced by method. This points to the measurement error inherent in any assessment instrument, no matter how carefully crafted. The ultimate conclusion centers around the notion that measurement error will be reduced with not only multi-method assessment but also combined quantitative and holistic analysis. The implication for the broader research is to spend less energy debating among methods and more effort developing comprehensive strategies that better address "organizational effectiveness" versus "individual difference" focused research goals.
机译:人与组织的适应-作为人与环境适应领域中的一个独特结构-在丰富的,多学科的研究领域中融合了许多咨询心理学的独特主题。但是,衡量人员与组织的契合度是一项复杂的工作。迄今为止,测量工作带来了几种相互竞争的方法,每种方法的支持者都进行了严格的辩论。本文通过使用相同方法在不同组织中进行人口统计,在多方法设计下收集拟合数据,从而解决了这一争论。通过将评估方法集成到更全面的手段中,这种设计扩展了文献资料,从而抓住了人与组织契合的本质。利用咨询心理学广泛关注的心理评估优势,已经考虑到了人与组织的契合度的定量和整体角度。研究结果表明,定量的人-组织契合度在各种方法中可能看起来有所不同。人们认为,适合个人组织的前提没有任何作用。对心理主题的整体分析表明,即使采用相似的文化模式,量化方法也能影响人与组织的契合度。这指出了任何评估工具固有的测量误差,无论如何精心设计。最终结论围绕这样一个概念,即不仅可以通过多方法评估,而且可以通过结合定量和整体分析来减少测量误差。对于更广泛的研究的意义在于,减少方法之间的争论,而花费更多的精力来开发能够更好地解决“组织有效性”与“个体差异”研究目标的综合策略。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bassman, Eric Marshall.;

  • 作者单位

    Northwestern University.;

  • 授予单位 Northwestern University.;
  • 学科 School counseling.;Occupational psychology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1999
  • 页码 165 p.
  • 总页数 165
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号