首页> 外文学位 >Adsorption and coprecipitation of copper by the hydrous oxides of iron and aluminum: Macroscopic, modeling, and spectroscopic analyses.
【24h】

Adsorption and coprecipitation of copper by the hydrous oxides of iron and aluminum: Macroscopic, modeling, and spectroscopic analyses.

机译:铁和铝的水合氧化物对铜的吸附和共沉淀:宏观,模型和光谱分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Hydrous oxides of iron (HFO) and aluminum (HAO) were studied for their ability to reduce Cu to {dollar}mu{dollar}g/L levels typical of increasingly stringent wastewater discharge limits. Residual Cu was compared following adsorption (ADS), where Cu was contacted with preformed oxide flocs, and coprecipitation (CPT) where Cu was added prior to HFO or HAO precipitation. For the HAO-ADS system, residual Cu was markedly undersaturated with respect to homogeneous precipitation (PPT) of Cu(OH){dollar}sb2{dollar}(s) over the pH 6-9 range. In contrast, residual Cu was lowered by HFO-ADS for pH {dollar}<{dollar} 7.5 but comparable to PPT at higher pH. Compared to ADS, residual Cu after CPT was similar for HAO but was dramatically lower for HFO. More Cu was incorporated internal to the HFO flocs during CPT, suggesting some Cu substitution into the HFO lattice.; From the sorption isotherms, a total apparent site density of 0.425 mole Cu/mole Fe was obtained for HFO-CPT. This site density, which cannot be solely attributed to surface area effects, could be due to Cu adsorption during growth of HFO crystallites or the formation of mixed Fe,Cu hydroxy species. Isotherms suggest a Cu surface precipitate formed on HAO with solubility product lower than its HFO analogue. Therefore, HFO appears to be a better sorbent than HAO when adsorption reactions predominate; however, HAO is more effective in facilitating surface Cu precipitation. Both the pH-edge sorption data and sorption isotherms were modeled using the Generalized Two Layer Model and its extension, the Surface Precipitation Model, the latter being required for high sorbate-to-sorbent ratios.; Atomic Force Microscopy images suggest floc growth inhibition during HFO-CPT compared to HFO-ADS. X-ray diffraction analysis indicates that surface precipitation commences at a lower pH and surface coverage in the presence of HAO compared to HFO. Surface precipitation during HFO-ADS involves the presence of a discrete mixture of HFO and hydrous Cu oxide whereas a mixed Al,Cu oxide is formed during HAO-ADS.; Through a combination of macroscopic, modeling, and microscopic/spectroscopic analyses, insight was gained into the mechanisms responsible for removal of Cu from aqueous suspensions of HFO and HAO. This work has attempted to provide a fundamental understanding of the metal-oxide interactions which is essential for implementing such processes in full-scale water and wastewater treatment operations.
机译:研究了铁(HFO)和铝(HAO)的水合氧化物能够将Cu降低到废水排放极限日益严格的典型水平,将其降低到$μg/ L。比较吸附后的残留铜(ADS),其中铜与预先形成的氧化物絮凝物接触;共沉淀(CPT),在HFO或HAO沉淀之前加入铜。对于HAO-ADS系统,在pH 6-9范围内,相对于Cu(OH){sb2} {b} {s}的均相沉淀(PPT),残留的Cu明显不饱和。相比之下,HFO-ADS在pH值<7.5时降低了残留的Cu,但与较高的pH值下的PPT相当。与ADS相比,CAO后CPT后的残留Cu相似,而HFO则显着降低。在CPT期间,更多的Cu被掺入到HFO絮凝物内部,表明在HFO晶格中有一些Cu取代。从吸附等温线,获得了HFO-CPT的总表观位点密度为0.425摩尔Cu /摩尔Fe。不能仅归因于表面积效应的该位点密度可能是由于HFO微晶生长过程中的Cu吸附或混合的Fe,Cu羟基物种的形成。等温线表明,在HAO上形成的铜表面沉淀物的溶解度低于其HFO类似物。因此,当吸附反应占优势时,HFO似乎比HAO更好。然而,HAO在促进表面Cu沉淀方面更有效。 pH边缘吸附数据和吸附等温线均使用广义两层模型及其扩展模型“表面沉淀模型”建模,后者是高吸附物与吸附剂比率所必需的。与HFO-ADS相比,原子力显微镜图像显示HFO-CPT期间絮凝物的生长受到抑制。 X射线衍射分析表明,与HFO相比,在存在HAO的情况下,表面沉淀始于较低的pH和表面覆盖率。 HFO-ADS期间的表面沉淀涉及HFO和含水Cu氧化物的离散混合物的存在,而在HAO-ADS期间形成混合的Al,Cu氧化物。通过宏观,建模和微观/光谱分析的结合,获得了从HFO和HAO的水悬浮液中去除Cu的机理的见解。这项工作试图提供对金属-氧化物相互作用的基本理解,这对于在大规模水和废水处理操作中实施此类过程至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号