• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Christianity and culture: Matthew Arnold, Charles Kingsley and the Broad Church movement.
【24h】

Christianity and culture: Matthew Arnold, Charles Kingsley and the Broad Church movement.

机译：基督教与文化：马修·阿诺德（Matthew Arnold），查尔斯·金斯利（Charles Kingsley）和广泛教会运动。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Matthew Arnold and Charles Kingsley developed much of their thought within the intellectual context of the nineteenth-century Broad Church movement. The influence of Kant and Spinoza, along with mediators Schleiermacher and Coleridge, figures large in both of their thought, resulting in many similar intellectual positions. However, whereas Arnold's cultural and biblical criticism constitutes a further development in the direction of the Broad Church movement, Kingsley's contribution is, for the most part, conservative in the sense that it constitutes both an apology for and practical application of Broad Church principles which were, for the most part, espoused earlier by other persons.Essential Christianity, as understood by Arnold, formed the very center and bulwark of Culture in England. Therefore, it was crucial for the proper development of Culture that the ratio and relationship of Hebraism and Hellenism within Christianity be discerned and implemented as a formative tool of enculturation. Whereas the Hebraism of England was its strength, the lack of sufficient Hellenism, which had originated in a misapplication of Scripture, was England's severest weakness and the primary cause of widespread Philistinism. Kingsley and Arnold both recognized the want of sufficient intellectual freedom within the religion of Dissent and the need for Hellenization. However, Kingsley's Evangelical upbringing and his later devotion to F. D. Maurice appears to have set ideological parameters beyond which he was unwilling to venture. Arnold's rejection of miracles and metaphysics in religion left him free to seek an essence of Christianity beyond the traditional creedal expressions.Behind Arnold's assessment of Christianity is his quest for the authentic Jesus. Arnold's emphasis upon the rhetoric of Jesus, as opposed to the synoptic problem, as a useful means of establishing authenticity, not only sets him apart from his contemporaries but makes him particularly modern as a biblical critic. However, Arnold's argument that Hellenism was integrated into the essentially Hebraic religion of Jesus through the influence of Paul is challenged by modern critics, who recognize Jesus himself as significantly Hellenized. Paul is, nevertheless, crucial to Arnold's Christianity, as it is through Paul that Arnold can set up the ideal of the State as fundamental to Culture.
机译：马修·阿诺德（Matthew Arnold）和查尔斯·金斯利（Charles Kingsley）在19世纪广泛教会运动的思想背景下发展了许多思想。康德和斯宾诺莎的影响力，以及调解人施莱尔马赫尔和科尔里奇，在他们两个思想中的影响力都很大，从而产生了许多相似的知识分子立场。然而，尽管阿诺德的文化和圣经批评构成了广义教会运动方向上的进一步发展，但金斯利的贡献在很大程度上是保守的，因为它既构成了对广义教会原则的道歉，又构成了实际应用。正如阿诺德（Arnold）所理解的那样，基本基督教是英国文化的中心和堡垒。因此，对于文化的正确发展至关重要的是，辨别希伯来主义和希腊化在基督教中的比例和关系，并将其作为培养的形成工具。英格兰的希伯来主义是它的强项，而缺乏足够的希腊化则是英格兰最严重的弱点，也是造成广泛的非利士主义的主要原因。金斯利（Kingsley）和阿诺德（Arnold）都承认在异议宗教中需要足够的知识自由，并且需要希腊化。然而，金斯利的福音教育和他后来对莫里斯的奉献似乎已经设定了意识形态参数，他不愿意冒险。阿诺德（Arnold）对宗教中的奇迹和形而上学的拒绝使他自由地寻求超越传统信条表达方式的基督教精髓。阿诺德（Arnold）对基督教的评价背后是他对真实耶稣的追求。阿诺德（Arnold）强调耶稣的修辞，而不是概要问题，是确立真实性的有用手段，这不仅使他与当代人脱颖而出，而且使他成为圣经批评家特别现代。但是，阿诺德认为希腊化是通过保罗的影响而被整合到耶稣的希伯来宗教中的论点受到了现代批评家的挑战，他们认为耶稣本人是希腊化。但是，保罗对阿诺德的基督教至关重要，因为通过保罗，阿诺德可以将国家理想确立为文化的基础。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jones, Tod Earl.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Maryland, College Park.;

  • 授予单位 University of Maryland, College Park.;
  • 学科 Biography.Religion Philosophy of.History Church.Literature English.Religion History of.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1997
  • 页码 213 p.
  • 总页数 213
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号