• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Dimensions of intuition: First-round validation studies.
【24h】

Dimensions of intuition: First-round validation studies.

机译：直觉的维度：第一轮验证研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study utilized confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), canonical correlation analysis (CCA), regression analysis (RA), and correlation analysis (CA) for first-round validation of the researcher's Dimensions of Intuition (DOI) instrument. The DOI examined 25 personal characteristics and situations purportedly predictive of intuition. Data was collected from 302 respondents, ages 20--79, from differing occupations and educational backgrounds nationwide. Hypothesis 1: CFA disconfirmed the theorized 3- and 21-factor intuition models, finding 15 factors, accounting for 65.6% of the variance, to be the most efficient capture of intuition. Hypothesis 2: CCA tested the relationship between the 15 factors and the brain quadrants, as measured by the Herrmann Brain Dominance InstrumentRTM (HBDIRTM). Seven factors loaded on quadrant A; nine each on quadrants B, C and D, confirming this hypothesis. Hypothesis 3: RA was used to test the relationship between the 15 factors and the HBDIRTM brain hemispheres. An R-squared value of .667 was found for the right/left hemispheres; .575 for the cerebral/limbic hemispheres, confirming this hypothesis. Hypotheses 2 and 3 findings provided some evidence of intuition as a whole-brained functionality, with right/left scores providing the most discriminative value. Hypothesis 4: CA was utilized to examine the relationship between the DOI total and variable T scores and the six subscales of the Personal Style Inventory (PSI). Expected directions were found for 47 of 54 significant correlations between the variable scores and subscales (87% hit rate). Significant correlations in expected directions were also found between the DOI total score and the Control, Vision and Insight subscales. The overall conclusion supports the DOI's validity and reliability; though additional validation studies with other populations and other statistical methods, including structural equation modeling and multi-dimensional scaling, are recommended.
机译：这项研究利用验证性因子分析（CFA），规范相关分析（CCA），回归分析（RA）和相关分析（CA）对研究人员的直觉维度（DOI）仪器进行了第一轮验证。 DOI检查了25个据称可预测直觉的个人特征和情况。数据来自全国各地不同职业和教育背景的302名20-79岁的受访者。假设1：CFA否认理论上的3因子和21因子直觉模型，发现15个因子（占方差的65.6％）是最有效的直觉捕获方法。假设2：CCA测试了15个因素与大脑象限之间的关系，该关系通过Herrmann脑优势仪器RTM（HBDIRTM）进行了测量。象限A上加载了七个因子； B，C和D象限各有9个，证实了这一假设。假设3：RA用于检验15个因素与HBDIRTM脑半球之间的关系。发现右/左半球的R平方值为.667；对于大脑/边缘半球为0.575，证实了这一假设。假设2和3的发现提供了一些直觉作为全脑功能的证据，其中右/左得分提供了最大的判别价值。假设4：使用CA检验DOI总分和可变T分数与个人风格量表（PSI）的六个子量表之间的关系。在变量分数和分量表之间的54个显着相关中，有47个的预期方向被发现（命中率87％）。在DOI总分与对照，视觉和洞察力分量表之间，还发现了预期方向上的显着相关性。总体结论支持DOI的有效性和可靠性。尽管建议使用其他人群和其他统计方法进行其他验证研究，包括结构方程模型和多维比例缩放。

著录项

  • 作者

    Vrugtman, Rosanne.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Missouri - Saint Louis.;

  • 授予单位 University of Missouri - Saint Louis.;
  • 学科 Education Tests and Measurements.;Psychology Psychometrics.;Education Educational Psychology.;Education Adult and Continuing.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 539 p.
  • 总页数 539
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 土壤学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号