• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Public participation in urban mega-project planning: A case study of Pacific Place, Vancouver, British Columbia.
【24h】

Public participation in urban mega-project planning: A case study of Pacific Place, Vancouver, British Columbia.

机译：公众参与城市大型项目规划：以不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华市太平洋广场为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The 1980s witnessed a trend toward a new model of urban development, the urban mega-projects (UMPS). These projects have significant impacts on cities, on the way we practice planning and on the way we involve the community in decision-making processes. A critical question from a community standpoint is the degree to which ordinary citizens have the opportunity to influence the nature and shape of such development. In short, how participatory are UMP planning processes? This leads to the question of how we can evaluate the effectiveness of public participation? This leads in turn to the important question of why public participation in UMP planning processes can be effective or not?; To address these questions it is necessary to develop a theoretical categorization of public participation. Three models are identified that each inform a different perspective on the practice of public participation. These range from the current dominant tradition of the rational comprehensive model, through the advocacy model, to the radical planning model. The theory is also used to identify characteristics of effective public participation. It is argued that effective public participation must be equitable, efficient and efficacious. Public participation can only be effective when community organizations have sufficient power in the process to ensure that their priorities are recognized and acted upon.; The research data consists of a case study of one of the largest UMPS currently being developed in North America: the Pacific Place development in Vancouver. This is supplemented by reference to other contemporary UMPS, including Harbourfront and the Railway Lands in Toronto; Battery Park City in New York; the London Docklands and Canary Wharf; and the Mission Bay project in San Francisco. The research methods adopted within the case studies included a literature review, semi-structured interviews with the actors involved, participant observation, and the use of various published sources.; The conclusion that emerges is that public participation in UMP planning is not particularly effective. The necessary components of equity, efficiency and efficacy are missing. A number of principle reasons are outlined: the characteristics of the UMPS themselves, the nature of the public participation process and the theoretical foundations on which it is based. On the contrary the development of more effective public participation must rely on a bottom-up process that should start with citizens groups. It is argued that city governments need to forge stronger links with the community and emphasize the role of locality in determining the nature of UMPS. There is a need to revitalize local democracy and reaffirm the importance of effective public participation as part of this process.
机译：1980年代见证了一种新的城市发展模式的趋势，即城市大型项目（UMPS）。这些项目对城市，我们实践规划的方式以及使社区参与决策过程的方式都具有重大影响。从社区的角度来看，一个关键问题是普通公民在何种程度上有机会影响这种发展的性质和形式。简而言之，UMP计划流程如何参与？这就引出了一个问题，即我们如何评估公众参与的有效性？这就引出了一个重要的问题，即公众参与UMP规划过程为何会有效？为了解决这些问题，有必要发展公众参与的理论分类。确定了三个模型，每个模型对公众参与的实践提供了不同的观点。这些范围从理性综合模型的当前主导传统到倡导模型，再到激进的计划模型。该理论还用于确定有效公众参与的特征。有人认为，有效的公众参与必须公平，有效和有效。仅当社区组织在此过程中有足够的权力来确保其优先事项得到认可并采取行动时，公众参与才有效。研究数据包括对目前北美正在开发的最大UMPS之一的案例研究：温哥华的Pacific Place开发。另外，还参考了其他当代UMPS，包括Harbourfront和Toronto的Railway Lands；纽约州炮台公园市；伦敦港区和金丝雀码头；以及旧金山的Mission Bay项目。案例研究中采用的研究方法包括文献综述，对相关参与者的半结构化访谈，参与者观察以及各种公开来源的使用。得出的结论是，公众参与UMP规划并不是特别有效。缺少公平，效率和效力的必要组成部分。概述了许多原理性原因：UMPS本身的特征，公众参与过程的性质以及它所基于的理论基础。相反，发展更有效的公众参与必须依靠自下而上的过程，该过程应从公民团体开始。有人认为，城市政府需要与社区建立更牢固的联系，并强调地方在确定UMPS性质方面的作用。有必要振兴地方民主并重申有效公众参与作为这一进程一部分的重要性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Beazley, Michael John.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of British Columbia (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 The University of British Columbia (Canada).;
  • 学科 Urban and Regional Planning.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1994
  • 页码 292 p.
  • 总页数 292
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 区域规划、城乡规划;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号