• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Conservation credit: Motivating landowners to implement soil conservation practices through property tax credit
【24h】

Conservation credit: Motivating landowners to implement soil conservation practices through property tax credit

机译：保护信贷：通过财产税信贷鼓励土地所有者实施土壤保护措施

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Agricultural conservation policy has come under close scrutiny in recent years. Some argue present policy has not provided adequate coordination of agricultural programs and has failed to establish programs which provide landowners with the incentives to protect the soil and water resources. According to national surveys, soil erosion continues to be a serious problem in spite of considerable amounts of time and money expended on the conservation effort. Current agricultural practice continues to present a serious environmental threat to soil and water resources.;This research looked at a property tax credit approach (conservation credit) as an alternative to existing conservation programs for providing landowners with an incentive to operate their land in an environmentally sound manner. The conservation credit study rewarded landowners with a property tax credit if they controlled soil erosion on all of their cropland.;This study found that the conservation credit approach motivated landowners to install and maintain erosion control practices on their cropland. After program implementation, the percent of cropland protected from erosion increased from 49.8 to 85.6 percent in the treatment area. Average annual soil loss was reduced from 11.1 to 3.1 tons/hectare/year. This compared to no significant change in the control area.;Landowners were surveyed during the study and reported positive beliefs about the conservation credit program. The most common responses were that the program was fair, the rules were clear, participation was easy, and a strong desire for the program to be controlled locally. Landowners also believed the property tax credit approach was a good way to get conservation practices applied. They strongly supported continuation of the program.;Analysis of survey results suggests three independent variable as being significant predictors of landowner participation in the conservation credit program. They include farm economic factors, conservation ethic of the landowners, and beliefs about the conservation credit program.;Results of this study indicated that administrative and technical assistance costs would be reasonable from the public's perspective.
机译：近年来，农业保护政策受到了严格审查。有人认为，目前的政策未能对农业计划进行充分的协调，也未能建立能够为土地所有者提供保护土壤和水资源动力的计划。根据国家调查，尽管在保护工作上花费了大量时间和金钱，但土壤侵蚀仍然是一个严重的问题。当前的农业实践继续对土壤和水资源构成严重的环境威胁。这项研究着眼于财产税抵免法（保护信用），以替代现有的保护计划，以鼓励土地所有者在环境中经营土地健全的态度。保护信用研究如果控制了所有耕地的土壤侵蚀，则会向土地所有者奖励财产税抵免。该研究发现，保护信用方法促使土地所有者在其耕地上安装和维护侵蚀控制措施。计划实施后，受保护的农田受到侵蚀的百分比从治疗区域的49.8％增加到85.6％。年均土壤流失量从11.1吨/公顷/年减少到3.1吨/公顷/年。相比之下，控制区没有显着变化。在研究期间对Landowners进行了调查，并报告了有关保护信贷计划的积极信念。最普遍的回应是该计划公平，规则明确，参与容易，并且强烈希望在本地控制该计划。土地所有者还认为，财产税抵免方法是采用保护措施的好方法。他们强烈支持该计划的继续。；调查结果分析表明，三个独立变量是土地所有者参与保护信贷计划的重要预测指标。其中包括农场的经济因素，土地所有者的保护道德以及对保护信贷计划的信念。研究结果表明，从公众的角度来看，行政和技术援助成本是合理的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Griswold, Jerry Robert.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Wisconsin - Madison.;
  • 学科 Environmental science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1989
  • 页码 176 p.
  • 总页数 176
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号