• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >A comparison of developmental center and community center staffs: Job satisfaction, work environment, and attitudes toward developmentally disabled clients.
【24h】

A comparison of developmental center and community center staffs: Job satisfaction, work environment, and attitudes toward developmentally disabled clients.

机译：发展中心和社区中心工作人员的比较：工作满意度，工作环境和对残疾客户的态度。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Staff members' perceptions of five aspects of job satisfaction, three aspects of the work environment, and attitudes toward disabled people were examined in two different settings: a New York State Developmental Center, and 14 New York State operated community Immediate Care Facilities (ICF's).; Data collection employed random sampling of direct care staff members working with clients functioning at the profound and at the severe levels of intellectual and adaptive functioning. Overall, 104 staff members from the developmental center and 102 staff members from community homes completed the Job Descriptive Index (JDI), which assessed factors related to job satisfaction; the Work Environment Scale (WES), which assessed factors related to environment, relationships, and organization; and the Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons Scale (ATDP), which assessed attitudes toward disabled persons.; The results indicated that compared to developmental center staff members, community center ICF staff members were more satisfied with their jobs (t = 3.05, p {dollar}<{dollar}.02), and with their work environments (t = 4.76, p {dollar}<{dollar}.0001). There were no significant differences in attitude toward developmentally disabled persons (t =.08, p =.938), and no significant correlation between job satisfaction and attitudes toward developmentally disabled persons (r = {dollar}-.044{dollar}, p =.532).; Similarly, community ICF staff members had significantly greater scores on their ratings of work (t = 3.26, p {dollar}<{dollar}.001) and coworkers (t = 2.93, p {dollar}<{dollar}.004), but no significant differences regarding supervisors (t =.74, p =.458), pay (t =.97, p =.331) or promotions (t =.60, p =.549) on the Job Descriptive Index. They had significantly greater scores on the relationship dimension (t = 3.87, p {dollar}<{dollar}.0001) and the systems maintenance dimension (t = 6.40, p {dollar}<{dollar}.0001), but no significant difference for the personal growth dimension (t =.92, p =.359) of the Work Environment Scale.; Correlations between dependent measures and age, sex, education, length of employment at present work location, and travel time to work indicated minimal relationships (r's {dollar}<{dollar}.115). Stepwise multiple regression equations indicated that the most significant predictor of job satisfaction was the work environment (Beta =.618, t = 10.050, p =.001).; It was concluded that differences in job satisfaction between these two groups of employees exist and are strongly related to work environment. Staff members working with developmentally disabled clients in the community are more satisfied with their jobs and their environments than are staff members working with similar clients in the developmental center.
机译：在两种不同的情况下，检查了工作人员对工作满意度的五个方面，工作环境的三个方面以及对残疾人的态度的看法：纽约州发展中心和纽约州运营的14个社区即时护理设施（ICF） 。;数据收集采用对直接服务人员的随机抽样，这些人员与在智力和适应功能的深远和严格水平下工作的客户一起工作。总体而言，发展中心的104名工作人员和社区之家的102名工作人员完成了工作描述指数（JDI），该指数评估了与工作满意度有关的因素；工作环境量表（WES），评估与环境，关系和组织有关的因素；对残疾人的态度量表（ATDP）评估了对残疾人的态度。结果表明，与发展中心工作人员相比，社区中心ICF工作人员对他们的工作（t = 3.05，p {dollar} <{dollar} .02）和工作环境（t = 4.76，p）更满意。 {dollar} <{dollar} .0001）。对发育障碍者的态度无显着差异（t = .08，p = .938），工作满意度与对发育障碍者的态度之间无显着相关性（r = {dol}-。044 {dol}，p = .532）。同样，社区ICF工作人员的工作评分（t = 3.26，p {dollar} <{dollar} .001）和同事（t = 2.93，p {dollar} <{dollar} .004）的评分明显更高，但在工作描述指数上，主管（t = .74，p = .458），薪酬（t = .97，p = .331）或晋升（t = .60，p = .549）没有显着差异。他们在关系维度（t = 3.87，p {美元} <{dollar} .0001）和系统维护维度（t = 6.40，p {dollar} <{dollar} .0001）上得分均明显更高，但无显着性得分工作环境量表的个人成长维度的差异（t = .92，p = .359）。相关措施与年龄，性别，教育程度，当前工作地点的就业时间以及上班时间之间的相关性表明，两者之间的关系极小（r's {dollar} <{dollar} .115）。逐步多元回归方程表明，工作满意度最重要的预测指标是工作环境（Beta = .618，t = 10.050，p = .001）。结论是，这两组员工之间在工作满意度上存在差异，并且与工作环境密切相关。与社区中有发展障碍的客户一起工作的员工比在发展中心与类似客户一起工作的员工更满意他们的工作和环境。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nissenbaum, Michael Leonard.;

  • 作者单位

    Hofstra University.;

  • 授予单位 Hofstra University.;
  • 学科 Psychology Social.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1988
  • 页码 103 p.
  • 总页数 103
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 社会心理、社会行为;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号