• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >CONTENT ANALYSIS OF 'PEOPLE'S DAILY' EDITORIALS AND RESEARCH PAPERS, 1949-1981: KUHN'S MODEL OF SCIENTIFIC PARADIGMATIC REVOLUTIONS APPLIED TO THE SOCIALIZATION OF SCIENTISTS IN CHINA. (VOLUMES I AND II).
【24h】

CONTENT ANALYSIS OF 'PEOPLE'S DAILY' EDITORIALS AND RESEARCH PAPERS, 1949-1981: KUHN'S MODEL OF SCIENTIFIC PARADIGMATIC REVOLUTIONS APPLIED TO THE SOCIALIZATION OF SCIENTISTS IN CHINA. (VOLUMES I AND II).

机译：1949-1981年“人民日报”编辑和研究论文的内容分析：库恩的科学范式革命范式适用于中国的科学家社会化。 （第一和第二卷）。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This dissertation examines the socialization of scientists in China with respect to their research ideologies and provides a theoretical interpretation of cross-paradigm communication. The basic questions asked concerning the socialization of scientists are: (1) What was the research ideology of scientists in 1949? (2) What was the nature of the socialization forces during 1949 to 1981? (3) What were the socialization effects during 1949 to 1981?;The following answers are obtained. First, scientists in 1949 adhered to a positivist research ideology. Second, when Maoists were in power, socialization forces, brought to bear by a combination of mass, folk, and personal media, worked for a shift in the research ideology of scientists. Third, there was a significant shift away from the positivist research ideology during the Cultural Revolution. Researchers in the biological sciences and clinical medicine were socialized to a significantly greater extent than those of the physical sciences in two categories: moral incentives and leadership of Mao. However, a scientific revolution in China was aborted, due largely to a lack of exemplary scientific achievements belonging to the Maoist paradigm. Only three percent of research papers in the Chinese Medical Journal and seven percent of research papers in Scientia Sinica during the latter part of the Cultural Revolution (1973-1976) manifest credible "conversion" to the Maoist paradigm by using Maoist cosmology to guide research. After the Cultural Revolution, scientists shifted back to the positivist paradigm.;The model of cross-paradigm communication, derived from the writings of Thomas Kuhn and Michael Mulkay, explains and gives coherence to the information and data regarding the socialization of scientists in China.;The questions are answered by means of literature research, and content analysis of People's Daily editorials, Chinese Medical Journal, and Scientia Sinica. The principal categories of content analysis are: Maoist cosmology, reliance on the masses, moral versus material incentives, folk science, and leadership of Mao.
机译：本文从研究者的思想出发，对中国科学家的社会化进行了考察，并为跨范式传播提供了理论解释。有关科学家社会化的基本问题是：（1）1949年科学家的研究思想是什么？ （2）1949年至1981年，社会化力量的性质是什么？ （3）1949年至1981年期间的社会化影响是什么？首先，1949年的科学家坚持实证主义的研究思想。其次，当毛派执政时，社会化力量在大众，民间和个人媒体的共同作用下发挥了作用，为科学家的研究意识形态的转变做出了努力。第三，在文化大革命期间，从实证主义研究思想上发生了重大转变。生物科学和临床医学的研究人员在两个方面比物理科学的研究人员得到了更大程度的社会化：道德激励和毛泽东的领导。但是，中国的科学革命失败了，这在很大程度上是由于缺乏属于毛主义范式的杰出科学成就。在《文化大革命》后期（1973-1976年），《中华医学杂志》上只有3％的论文和《科学》杂志上的7％的论文通过使用毛主义的宇宙学来指导研究，表明向毛主义范式的可信“转变”。文化大革命后，科学家们回到了实证主义范式。跨范式的交流模型源于托马斯·库恩（Thomas Kuhn）和迈克尔·穆尔凯（Michael Mulkay）的著作，解释并赋予了有关中国科学家社会化的信息和数据以连贯性。 ；这些问题通过文献研究和《人民日报》社论，《中华医学杂志》和《科学》的内容分析得到解答。内容分析的主要类别是：毛主义的宇宙论，对群众的依赖，道德对物质的激励，民间科学和对毛的领导。

著录项

  • 作者

    CHOW, PETER KUNG-WO.;

  • 作者单位

    Temple University.;

  • 授予单位 Temple University.;
  • 学科 Mass Communications.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1984
  • 页码 651 p.
  • 总页数 651
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号