• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>British journal of sports medicine >Thomas Kuhn's 'Structure of Scientific Revolutions' applied to exercise science paradigm shifts: Example including the Central Governor Model
【24h】

Thomas Kuhn's 'Structure of Scientific Revolutions' applied to exercise science paradigm shifts: Example including the Central Governor Model

机译：托马斯·库恩（Thomas Kuhn）的“科学革命结构”应用于科学范式转换：包括中央总督模型在内的示例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

According to Thomas Kuhn, the scientific progress of any discipline could be distinguished by a pre-paradigm phase, a normal science phase and a revolution phase. The science advances when a scientific revolution takes place after silent period of normal science and the scientific community moves ahead to a paradigm shift. I suggest there has been a recent change of course in the direction of the exercise science. According to the 'current paradigm', exercise would be probably limited by alterations in either central command or peripheral skeletal muscles, and fatigue would be developed in a task-dependent manner. Instead, the central governor model (GCM) has proposed that all forms of exercise are centrally-regulated, the central nervous system would calculate the metabolic cost required to complete a task in order to avoid catastrophic body failure. Some have criticized the CGM and supported the traditional interpretation, but recently the scientific community appears to have begun an intellectual trajectory to accept this theory. First, the increased number of citations of articles that have supported the CGM could indicate that the community has changed the focus. Second, relevant journals have devoted special editions to promote the debate on subjects challenged by the CGM. Finally, scientists from different fields have recognized mechanisms included in the CGM to understand the exercise limits. Given the importance of the scientific community in demarcating a Kuhnian paradigm shift, I suggest that these three aspects could indicate an increased acceptance of a centrally-regulated effort model, to understand the limits of exercise.
机译：托马斯·库恩（Thomas Kuhn）认为，任何学科的科学进步都可以通过范式前阶段，正常科学阶段和革命阶段来区分。在普通科学的沉默期过后发生科学革命时，科学就会进步，科学界也将朝着范式转变的方向前进。我建议最近在运动科学方向上发生了变化。根据“当前范例”，运动可能会受到中枢命令或周围骨骼肌改变的限制，并且疲劳将以任务依赖的方式发展。取而代之的是，中央调节器模型（GCM）提出所有运动形式都是中央调节的，中枢神经系统将计算完成一项任务所需的代谢成本，以避免灾难性的身体衰竭。一些人批评了CGM并支持传统解释，但是最近科学界似乎已经开始接受这一理论的思想轨迹。首先，支持CGM的文章被引用的次数增加，可能表明社区已经改变了重点。其次，相关杂志专门发行了一些版本，以促进有关CGM挑战的主题的辩论。最后，来自不同领域的科学家已经认识到CGM中包括的机制以了解运动极限。考虑到科学界在划定库恩范式转变方面的重要性，我认为这三个方面可能表明人们越来越接受中央调节的努力模型，以了解运动的局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号