• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >LEADERSHIP STYLES AND CAREER PATTERNS OF SUCCESSFUL U.S. NAVY AIRCRAFT CARRIER AVIATORS.
【24h】

LEADERSHIP STYLES AND CAREER PATTERNS OF SUCCESSFUL U.S. NAVY AIRCRAFT CARRIER AVIATORS.

机译：成功的美国海军航空母舰飞行员的领导风格和职业生涯模式。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The Problem. The U.S. Navy does not use leadership style as a criterion for officer assignment. This practice does not correspond with Fiedler's contingency theory which postulates that the effectiveness of a group and the resulting success of its leader are contingent upon matching a leader's leadership style with a favorable group situation.;Method. All data were collected using a researcher designed questionnaire. The questionnaire solicited information on the respondent's career pattern, requested the respondents to complete a Least Preferred Co-worker (LPC) scale, and requested contingency model data (leader-member relations, task structure and position power) for each respondent's last six leadership positions.;Each respondent's leadership style was obtained using his LPC score. Each respondent's career pattern was compared to the Navy's career pattern model to determine if most of the respondents had followed it. Finally, the percentage of each respondent's career spent in situations favorable, neutral and unfavorable was calculated using the contingency model.;Results. Analysis of the data indicated that the most prevalent leadership style found among successful carrier aviators was task-oriented, that most successful carrier aviators had followed the Navy's career pattern model, and that most task-oriented carrier aviators had spent the majority of their careers in favorable leadership positions, while most relationship-oriented carrier aviators had not.;The purpose of this research was to determine the impact of leadership style and career pattern on the career success of U.S. Navy aircraft carrier aviators. This was accomplished by analyzing the leadership styles and career patterns of successful carrier aviators using Fiedler's contingency model to determine if the majority of successful carrier aviators had held leadership positions favorable to their leadership styles.;The results of this research indicated a lack of support for Fiedler's contingency model. Although most task-oriented successful carrier aviators followed the model, relationship-oriented successful carrier aviators did not.
机译：问题。美国海军没有将领导风格作为人员分配的标准。这种做法与Fiedler的权变理论不符，后者的理论认为，团队的有效性及其领导者的成功取决于领导者的领导风格与良好的团队环境相匹配。使用研究人员设计的问卷收集所有数据。该问卷征集了有关受访者职业模式的信息，要求受访者填写最不喜欢的同事（LPC）量表，并要求获得每个受访者最近六个领导职位的应急模型数据（领导成员关系，任务结构和职位权力） 。;每个受访者的领导风格都是使用他的LPC得分获得的。将每个受访者的职业模式与海军的职业模式模型进行比较，以确定大多数受访者是否都遵循了这一模式。最后，使用权变模型计算了每个受访者在有利，中立和不利情况下所花费的职业百分比。对数据的分析表明，在成功的航母飞行员中发现的最普遍的领导风格是面向任务的，大多数成功的航母飞行员都遵循了海军的职业模式模型，并且大多数以任务为导向的航母都将大部分职业用于有利的领导职务，而大多数面向关系的航空母舰飞行员则没有。；本研究的目的是确定领导方式和职业模式对美国海军航空母舰飞行员事业成功的影响。这是通过使用Fiedler的权变模型分析成功的航空母舰飞行员的领导风格和职业模式来确定大多数成功的航空母舰飞行员是否拥有对其领导风格有利的领导职务。 Fiedler的权变模型。尽管大多数面向任务的成功承运人飞行员都遵循该模型，但是关系导向的成功承运人飞行员却没有。

著录项

  • 作者

    APAP, ANTONIO.;

  • 作者单位

    United States International University.;

  • 授予单位 United States International University.;
  • 学科 Business administration.
  • 学位 D.B.A.
  • 年度 1982
  • 页码 117 p.
  • 总页数 117
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号