• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The Impact of Divorce Resolution Procedures, on Inter-Parental Conflict and Positional Power.
【24h】

The Impact of Divorce Resolution Procedures, on Inter-Parental Conflict and Positional Power.

机译：离婚解决程序对父母之间的冲突和地位权的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Characteristics of conflict are an important factor relating to a family's functioning post-divorce. Families featuring high levels of intense and/or destructive conflict post-divorce are most at risk for maladjustment (Kelly & Emery, 2003). Previous research indicates that the use of mediation may shorten the adversarial process, produce more agreements, and foster more communication between parents when compared to litigation (Dillon & Emery, 1996; Emery, Laumann-Billings, Waldron, Sbarra & Dillon, 2001; Peeples, Reynolds, Harris, 2008). However, the notion that mediation reduces co-parental conflict in comparison to litigation is less straightforward. An analysis regarding the ability of mediation to transfer its theoretical premise of negotiation, interest-based problem solving, and balance of power to the management of co-parental conflict post-divorce is lacking in research. In this study, conflict frequency, conflict intensity, content of conflict, conflict resolution, and decision-making capabilities were analyzed in relation to divorce resolution procedure (mediation vs. litigation) and legal custody arrangement (joint vs. sole). It was hypothesized that parents who resolved their divorce using mediation would experience better outcomes related to conflict frequency, conflict intensity, conflict resolution, and equality in decision-making than parents who resolved their divorce through litigation. It was also hypothesized that parents who had a joint legal custody arrangement would experience better outcomes related to the dependent variables than parents who had sole legal custody arrangements. Finally, it was predicted that the combination of divorce resolution procedure and legal custody arrangement would interact to produce the most beneficial outcomes for parents who both mediated their divorce and had a joint legal custody arrangement.;Conflict frequency, conflict intensity, content of conflict, conflict resolution and decision-making ability were measured using self-reports. The sample consisted of 171 participants who were recruited from word of mouth, online parenting support groups and the Amazon mTurk crowdsourcing website. Participants completed an online survey consisting of the modified O'Leary-Porter Scale, the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale, the Ineffective Arguing Index and a scale developed by the researcher to assess decision-making capabilities. Retrospective data was also collected for conflict frequency, conflict intensity, and conflict resolution as a control for pre-existing differences between groups. Main effects and interaction effects were analyzed using a 2 x 2 Factorial ANOVA.;Results indicated that parents who resolved their divorce through litigation engaged in significantly more ineffective methods of conflict resolution than parents who resolved their divorce through mediation. Additionally, parents who had a joint legal custody arrangement reported their partner as engaging in significantly more negotiation when resolving conflict than parents who had sole legal custody. There were no significant differences in conflict frequency, conflict intensity, decision-making capabilities, and use of psychological aggression, and physical assault between groups. There was also no significant interaction effect between divorce resolution procedure and legal custody arrangement. Confounds in the study were related to non-randomization of the sample, reliance on self-report data, and/or an overrepresentation of joint legal custody participants. Clinical implications and ideas for future research were discussed.
机译：冲突的特征是与家庭离婚后的运作有关的重要因素。离婚后充满激烈和/或破坏性冲突的家庭最容易出现适应不良的风险（Kelly＆Emery，2003）。先前的研究表明，与诉讼相比，使用调解可能会缩短对抗过程，达成更多协议并增进父母之间的交流（Dillon＆Emery，1996； Emery，Laurmann-Billings，Waldron，Sbarra＆Dillon，2001； Peeples ，雷诺兹，哈里斯，2008年）。但是，与诉讼相比，调解减少了同父母之间的冲突的观念并不那么直接。缺乏对调解将其谈判的理论前提，基于利益的问题解决以及权力平衡转移到离婚后同父母冲突管理上的能力的分析。在这项研究中，分析了离婚解决程序（调解与诉讼）和法律监护安排（联合与单独）之间的冲突频率，冲突强度，冲突内容，冲突解决方法和决策能力。据推测，与通过诉讼解决离婚的父母相比，通过调解解决离婚的父母会遇到与冲突频率，冲突强度，解决冲突和决策平等有关的更好的结果。也有假设认为，具有共同法律监护安排的父母比因果变量的父母会比具有唯一法律监护安排的父母经历更好的结果。最后，预计离婚解决程序与法定监护安排的结合将相互作用，从而为调解离婚并具有共同法定监护安排的父母产生最有益的结果。冲突频率，冲突强度，冲突内容，使用自我报告来衡量冲突解决和决策能力。该样本包括171名参与者，这些参与者来自口口相传，在线育儿支持小组和Amazon mTurk众包网站。参加者完成了一项在线调查，其中包括修改后的O'Leary-Porter量表，修订后的冲突策略量表，无效争论指标以及研究人员开发的用于评估决策能力的量表。还收集了冲突频率，冲突强度和冲突解决方案的回顾性数据，以控制组之间先前存在的差异。使用2 x 2阶乘方差分析分析主要影响和互动影响；结果表明，通过诉讼解决离婚的父母比通过调解解决离婚的父母参与解决冲突的方法无效得多。此外，具有共同法律监护安排的父母报告说，与他们的伴侣相比，与有单独法律监护权的父母相比，在解决冲突时，其伴侣进行的谈判要多得多。群体之间的冲突频率，冲突强度，决策能力，心理攻击和身体攻击的使用没有显着差异。离婚解决程序与法定监护安排之间也没有显着的相互作用。研究中的混淆与样本的非随机化，对自我报告数据的依赖和/或联合法定监护人的代表过多有关。讨论了临床意义和对未来研究的想法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mante, Alyssa.;

  • 作者单位

    Hofstra University.;

  • 授予单位 Hofstra University.;
  • 学科 Social psychology.
  • 学位 Psy.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 171 p.
  • 总页数 171
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号