• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >A Question of Determinacy: American Procedural Poetry 1950-2013 and the Postmodern Critique of Subjectivity.
【24h】

A Question of Determinacy: American Procedural Poetry 1950-2013 and the Postmodern Critique of Subjectivity.

机译：确定性问题：1950-2013年美国程序诗和主观性的后现代批评。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This dissertation challenges the scholarly tendency to explain procedural (i.e., constraint or chance-driven) poetry as the poetic instantiation of the goals of the postmodern critique of subjectivity. I argue, instead, that while procedural forms of poetry do typically operate in a markedly postmodern fashion, the "canon" of this genre has long included poetic forms that directly contradict this postmodern reading. The study of these forms is important insofar as they resist the ethically questionable solipsism---one that refuses to recognize the possibility of meaning other to and outside of human social or poetic construction---in which the postmodern critique of subjectivity and postmodern poetics often find themselves. In examining the work of Jacques Derrida, I outline this postmodern solipsism in a theoretical, philosophical register, and I suggest that the late work of philosopher Martin Heidegger, specifically his concept of the "open," resists such thinking. In challenging the strict identity between proceduralism and postmodern thought, I draw attention to procedure-based texts that search for meaning beyond poetic construction, for example Raymond Queneau's radical combinatoric poetry, Christian Bok's collection Eunoia, and Gregory Betts' If Language. Such procedural practices, I argue, offer a poetics that, against postmodern solipsism, recognizes the otherness of the world, language, or texts as contexts of meaning in which poets participate, but do not master.
机译：本论文挑战了学术界倾向于将程序性（即约束性或偶然性）诗歌解释为后现代主观性批评目标的诗意化实例的学术趋势。相反，我认为，尽管诗歌的程序形式通常以明显的后现代方式运作，但这种体裁的“经典”早已包含了直接与后现代阅读相矛盾的诗歌形式。对这些形式的研究很重要，因为它们抵制了在伦理上有问题的唯我论-拒绝承认人类社会或诗意建构之外的意义的可能性-在这种形式中，后现代对主体性和后现代诗学的批判经常发现自己。在考察雅克·德里达的著作时，我从理论，哲学的角度概述了这种后现代的唯我论，并且我建议哲学家马丁·海德格尔（Martin Heidegger）的后期著作，特别是他的“开放”概念，会抵制这种思想。在挑战程序主义和后现代思想之间的严格同一性时，我提请人们注意基于过程的文本，这些文本在诗歌建构之外寻求意义，例如雷蒙德·奎纳（Raymond Queneau）的激进组合诗歌，克里斯蒂安·博克（Christian Bok）的收藏《 Eunoia》和格里高利·贝茨（Gregory Betts）的《如果语言》（If Language）。我认为，这样的程序性实践提供了一种诗学，与后现代的唯我主义相反，它认识到世界，语言或文本的不同性是诗人参与但不精通的意义上下文。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kurt, James.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Buffalo.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Buffalo.;
  • 学科 Literature American.;Literature Modern.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2015
  • 页码 172 p.
  • 总页数 172
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号