首页> 外文学位 >The alignment of response to intervention with the Common Core State Standards for English language arts.
【24h】

The alignment of response to intervention with the Common Core State Standards for English language arts.

机译:对干预措施的回应与英语语言艺术的《通用核心州标准》保持一致。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this qualitative exploratory research study was to examine the perceptions of K-12 educational leaders who have experience related to Response to Intervention (RtI) and Common Core State Standards (CCSS). This study was guided by the following three research questions: 1. What do K-12 educational leaders who have systems knowledge and experience, related to Response to Intervention and CCSS, perceive as the potential modifications needed to align the assessment components (universal screening and progress monitoring) of Response to Intervention with the CCSS for Language Arts? 2. What do K-12 educational leaders who have systems knowledge and experience, related to RtI and the CCSS, perceive as challenges that may result from any modifications to the assessment components needed to aligning the assessment components of RtI with the CCSS for Language Arts at? 3. What strategies do K-12 educational leaders who have systems knowledge and experience, related to RtI and CCSS, perceive might be utilized to address any challenges regarding aligning the assessment components (universal screening and progress monitoring) of RtI with the CCSS for Language Arts?;This research study utilized a qualitative exploratory design and involved eight educational leaders from Southern California. The findings from this study supported five practice recommendations. The first recommendation was for LEAs to develop a shared vision in regards to the role of RtI in supporting the CCSS for ELA. The second recommendation was for LEAs to develop teams of stakeholders to participate in the development of a comprehensive plan, throughout all phases of implementation, to align their RtI assessment tools to the CCSS for ELA. The third recommendation was for LEAs to develop RtI assessment tools that aligned to the CCSS for ELA. The fourth recommendation was for LEAs to select a College and Career Readiness (CCR) or 21st century framework, in order to help teachers to support the CCR skills embedded in the CCSS. The fifth recommendation was for LEAs to create strategic professional development plans to ensure that teachers receive adequate training to teach the College and Career Readiness skills embedded in the CCSS for ELA.
机译:这项定性探索性研究的目的是检验具有与干预反应(RtI)和通用核心州标准(CCSS)相关的K-12教育领导者的看法。这项研究受到以下三个研究问题的指导:1.具有与干预措施和CCSS相关的系统知识和经验的K-12教育领导者认为什么是调整评估组件(通用筛选和进度监控)对CCSS语言艺术的干预反应? 2.具有与RtI和CCSS相关的系统知识和经验的K-12教育领导者将什么视为挑战,可能是由于将RtI的评估部分与CCSS语言艺术相结合所需的评估部分的任何修改而导致的在? 3.具有RtI和CCSS相关知识和系统知识的K-12教育领导者会采取哪些策略,以应对将RtI的评估组件(通用筛选和进度监控)与CCSS for Language相匹配的任何挑战艺术?;该研究使用了定性的探索性设计,来自南加州的八位教育界领导参与其中。这项研究的结果支持了五个实践建议。第一个建议是让LEA就RtI在支持ELA CCSS中的作用达成共识。第二项建议是,对于LEA,应在整个实施的所有阶段中,建立利益相关者团队,以参与制定一项全面计划,以使其RtI评估工具与ELA的CCSS保持一致。第三项建议是让LEA开发与CCSS for ELA一致的RtI评估工具。第四个建议是让LEA选择大学和职业准备(CCR)或21世纪的框架,以帮助教师支持CCSS中嵌入的CCR技能。第五项建议是建议LEA制定战略性职业发展计划,以确保教师接受适当的培训,以教授CCSS for ELA中嵌入的大学和职业准备技能。

著录项

  • 作者

    Newman, Charles.;

  • 作者单位

    Pepperdine University.;

  • 授予单位 Pepperdine University.;
  • 学科 Education policy.;Educational administration.;Educational leadership.;Language arts.;Curriculum development.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 163 p.
  • 总页数 163
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号