• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Spatial Planning and Governance of Five-Year Planning in China: Case Studies of the Eleventh Five-Year Planning in Jiangsu Province.
【24h】

Spatial Planning and Governance of Five-Year Planning in China: Case Studies of the Eleventh Five-Year Planning in Jiangsu Province.

机译：中国五年规划的空间规划与治理：以江苏省“十一五”规划为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

As a legacy of the socialist state with central planning, Five-Year Planning (FYP) is very important in regulating socio-economic and spatial development even in post-reform China. Along with the changing context of political economy, the plan has experienced remarkable transformation in the last several decades. Particularly, during the 11th FYP Period, the FYP system emphasized spatial planning at different geographic scales, such as incorporating Major Function-Oriented Zoning (MFOZ) plan, enhancing the function of regional spatial planning, and conducting demonstration reform of planning institution at the municipal or county level.;In the literature, there has been little study on the role of FYP in transitional China. Especially, there is no study on how spatial planning in the FYP mechanism has operated and transformed in spatial regulatory practices. Under this context, drawn on the governance perspective, this study attempts to uncover the rationale and mechanisms of the changing spatial planning in the Chinese FYP system by building a conceptual framework. It aims to identify various stakeholders, institutions, planning administration and mechanisms of articulating spatial planning into FYP system and the effectiveness of spatial planning in solving place-specific governance issues during the plan formulation and implementation.;Specifically, this study attempts to answer the following three related research questions. First, why did the 11th FYP mechanism need to articulate the new spatial planning approaches? Second, what was the mechanism of articulating spatial planning into the 11th FYP system? Third, was articulating spatial planning into the 11th FYP system effective to govern spatial development? By examining the changing spatial planning in national FYP system and two case studies of the 11 th FYP in Jiangsu Province (at the regional and urban scale), the main findings of this study are as follows:;The thesis argues that the market-oriented reform and decentralized economic administration have changed China.s political economy and necessitated the transformation of the FYP mechanism, the embedded spatial planning in particular. In the pre-reform period, spatial planning was manifested in the ministry-led project-specific approach. From the beginning of the reform and opening to the 10th FYP Period, it was primarily manifested in setting up special policy areas to stimulate economic growth but failed in development control. Recently, spatial planning was transformed to a spatial policy framework approach with development guidance and control. It has also been tried to further integrate economic planning and spatial planning through the FYP mechanism. The new spatial planning approaches were articulated into the 11th FYP system at various geographic scales, as a response to the changing context of political economy and increasing socioeconomic transformation. However, due to various constraints in the period of institutional transition, the new spatial planning encounters various uncertainties to establish sound governance mechanisms in China.;At the provincial level, Jiangsu Region along the Yangtze River (JSYR) plan in the Jiangsu provincial 11th FYP system is employed for case study. The plan.s development process was highly embedded in local political economy, reflecting the decentralized and complicated spatial governance mechanisms in provincial China. Before it was articulated into the provincial 11th FYP system, the plan had already been implemented for half a year. In order to enhance the political status of the plan and cope with the crisis in the early plan implementation, Jiangsu provincial government articulated the spatial plan into the provincial 11th FYP system with a restructured spatial policy framework to enhance development control. However, it is revealed that, rather than as an institutional arena for regional coordination and sustainability, the articulated spatial planning in Jiangsu 11th FYP may only function as an instrument to develop new projects for capital accumulation. The actual sustainability of spatial development was ignored by local city governments.;At the municipal level, the demonstration reform of planning institution in Suzhou is employed for case study. The purpose of this reform was to improve plan coordination and development control at urban level. The realities in Suzhou indicated that the articulated spatial planning in Suzhou 11 th FYP failed to restructure municipal spatial governance relations and enhance local development control. It was no more than a cosmetic covering of the fragmented and overlapped planning functions instead of an integrated spatial governance mechanism in the city. Suzhou case shows that various local spatial plans were highly constrained by the sectoral codes, hierarchic regulations and top-down controlling quotas from relevant ministry-level departments. Under the nested planning administration shaped both by top-down regulations, and local discretion and manipulation, the plan coordination through the platform of spatial planning in Suzhou municipal 11th FYP was very difficult. Spatial planning has become a complicated arena and, the planning is mixed by central control and local initiatives with various levels of intervention.;In general, economic growth was the ultimately concerned governance issue in Chinese provinces and municipalities, which justifies local politics of spatial planning. Subsequently, the development philosophy of spatial planning at local levels was to alleviate the constraints of economic growth such as inadequate land supply and high environmental threshold rather than to establish the mechanisms of coordination and development control. This study advances the current understanding about the rationale and mechanisms about spatial planning and governance in contemporary China.
机译：作为中央计划的社会主义国家的遗产，即使在改革后的中国，五年计划（FYP）在调节社会经济和空间发展中也非常重要。随着政治经济环境的变化，该计划在过去的几十年中经历了重大变革。特别是，在“十一五”期间，“十一五”规划着重于不同地理尺度的空间规划，例如纳入主要功能区划（MFOZ）计划，增强区域空间规划功能，对市级规划机构进行示范改革等。在文献中，关于“五五”计划在转型中国的作用的研究很少。尤其是，关于“五年计划”机制中的空间规划如何在空间规制实践中运作和转变的研究尚未开展。在这种背景下，从治理的角度出发，本研究试图通过建立概念框架来揭示中国“五年计划”系统中空间规划变化的原理和机制。它旨在确定各种利益相关者，机构，计划管理机构以及将空间规划纳入FYP系统的机制，以及在规划制定和实施过程中空间规划在解决特定于地方的治理问题方面的有效性。三个相关的研究问题。首先，为什么“十一五”规划机制需要阐明新的空间规划方法？第二，将空间规划纳入“十一五”规划的机制是什么？第三，将空间规划纳入“十一五”规划体系是否有效地控制了空间发展？通过考察国家“十五”规划中不断变化的空间规划以及江苏省“十一五”规划的两个案例研究（区域和城市规模），本研究的主要发现如下：改革和分权化经济管理改变了中国的政治经济，必须改变“五年计划”机制，尤其是嵌入式空间规划。在改革前的时期，空间规划体现在教育部主导的针对项目的方法中。从改革开放开始到“十五”时期，它主要表现在建立刺激经济增长的特殊政策领域，但未能控制发展。最近，空间规划已转变为具有发展指导和控制的空间政策框架方法。还尝试通过“五年计划”机制进一步整合经济规划和空间规划。新的空间规划方法在各种地理尺度上都被纳入了“十一五”规划体系，以应对不断变化的政治经济环境和日益增长的社会经济转型。然而，由于制度变迁时期的种种制约，新的空间规划在中国建立健全的治理机制时遇到了各种不确定性。在省一级，江苏省“十一五”规划中的长江沿江江苏省规划系统用于案例研究。计划的制定过程高度嵌入地方政治经济中，反映了中国省份权力下放和复杂的空间治理机制。该计划在加入省“十一五”规划之前已经执行了半年。为了提高计划的政治地位并应对计划早期实施中的危机，江苏省政府将空间计划明确表述为省“十一五”规划编制体系，并通过重组空间政策框架来加强发展控制。然而，据透露，江苏十一五规划中明确的空间规划并非作为区域协调和可持续发展的制度舞台，而只能作为开发新的资本积累项目的工具。当地城市政府忽略了空间发展的实际可持续性。在市一级，以苏州市规划机构的示范改革为例进行研究。这项改革的目的是改善城市一级的计划协调和发展控制。苏州的现实情况表明，“十一五”期间明确的空间规划未能重组市政空间治理关系，也未能加强地方发展控制。它只不过是零散的和重叠的规划功能的装饰性覆盖，而不是城市中集成的空间治理机制。苏州案例表明，各种地方空间规划都受到部门代码的约束，相关部门级部门的分层法规和自上而下的控制配额。在自上而下的法规，地方的自由裁量权和操纵共同作用的嵌套式规划管理下，苏州市“十一五”规划通过空间规划平台进行规划协调非常困难。空间规划已成为一个复杂的领域，并且该规划是由中央控制和地方计划以及不同程度的干预混合在一起的；总体而言，经济增长是中国各省市最终关注的治理问题，这证明了空间规划的地方政治合理性。随后，地方一级空间规划的发展理念是减轻经济增长的限制，例如土地供应不足和环境门槛高，而不是建立协调和发展控制机制。这项研究推进了对当代中国空间规划与治理的理论基础和机制的当前理解。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wang, Lei.;

  • 作者单位

    The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;

  • 授予单位 The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;
  • 学科 Geography.;Urban planning.;Area planning development.;Asian studies.;Economics.;Public administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 184 p.
  • 总页数 184
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:53:33

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号