• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >China v. China: The paradox in regulating food and product safety.
【24h】

China v. China: The paradox in regulating food and product safety.

机译：中国诉中国：监管食品和产品安全的悖论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Since 2007, melamine-dairy products, lead-paint toys, clenbuterol-pork, and a long list of other defective products have raised concerns about the Chinese food and product safety regulatory system. This dissertation examines the conflicting ideologies of uniformity and flexibility within this regulatory system and its relationship to Chinese philosophical tradition.;The discussion is divided into six chapters. Chapter 1 provides an overview of the study. Chapter 2 details the flexibility derived from Confucianism, Daoism, and Buddhism, and the uniformity based in Legalism of the Chinese legal culture. Chapter 3 then explores the law and rule-making powers which embraces both centralization of uniformity and decentralization of flexibility within the current Chinese legal structure. Chapter 4 reviews the Chinese food and product safety law on paper, which reflects a conflict between market economic policy relying on self-regulated forces and supervisory control relying on administrative forces. Chapter 5 examines Chinese food and product safety law in action regarding the battle between the administrative and economic roles of government officials under the political dictatorship of uniformity and laissez-faire administration of flexibility. Chapter 6 reviews the paradox and concludes.;This study finds that although the Chinese legal system emphasizes communist dictatorship on paper, the Chinese food and product safety regulatory system relies on a laissez-faire administrative structure that embraces flexibility combining Confucian self-regulation, Daoist non-interference, Buddhist unwritten tradition, Legalist negation of morality, and capitalist self-interest-driven ideologies.;Flexibility is a form of freedom. These flexibility settings allow China to achieve rapid economic growth with diversity, but these settings also limit the food and product supervision to rely on an internal management system of the Party. Under this self-regulatory structure, economic activities are not subject to the constraints by written rules of law, unwritten rules of ethics, independent checks and balances, and public supervision by freedom of expression. Corporations may do whatever they want. The problem, therefore, cannot be solved by more law and more regulation, rather depends on self-transformation of the Party to adopt the fundamental concepts of the rule of law, such as reasonableness and justice, which were also promoted by Confucius.
机译：自2007年以来，三聚氰胺乳制品，含铅玩具，瘦肉精猪肉以及其他种类繁多的不良产品引起了人们对中国食品和产品安全监管体系的担忧。本文研究了这种监管体系内统一性和灵活性的冲突思想及其与中国哲学传统的关系。讨论分为六章。第1章概述了这项研究。第二章详细介绍了儒家，道家和佛教的灵活性，以及​​中国法律文化在法治基础上的统一性。第三章探讨了法律和规则制定的权力，既包括统一性的集中化，也包括灵活性的下放。第四章从纸上回顾了中国食品和产品安全法，反映了依靠自我调节力量的市场经济政策与依靠行政力量的监督控制之间的冲突。第五章探讨了中国食品和产品安全法，该法在统一的政治独裁统治和自由放任的灵活行政管理下，在政府官员的行政和经济角色之间的斗争中发挥了作用。第六章回顾了这一悖论并得出结论。该研究发现，尽管中国法律制度在纸面上强调了共产主义专政，但中国食品和产品安全监管体系依赖于放任自由的行政结构，该体制包含了结合儒家自我监管，道教的灵活性。不干涉，佛教不成文的传统，法家对道德的否定以及资本主义自我利益驱动的意识形态。灵活性是一种自由形式。这些灵活性设置可以使中国实现多元化的快速经济增长，但这些设置也限制了食品和产品监管依赖党的内部管理体系。在这种自我调节的结构下，经济活动不受书面法律规则，不成文道德规范，独立制衡和独立于言论自由的公共监督的约束。公司可以做他们想做的任何事情。因此，这个问题不能通过更多的法律和法规来解决，而是取决于党的自我转变，以采纳孔子所倡导的法治的基本概念，如合理性和正义性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tang, Nga Kit.;

  • 作者单位

    American University.;

  • 授予单位 American University.;
  • 学科 Law.;Asian Studies.
  • 学位 S.J.D.
  • 年度 2014
  • 页码 381 p.
  • 总页数 381
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号