• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Varieties of regional economic institutionalization: Europe, North America, and East Asia compared.
【24h】

Varieties of regional economic institutionalization: Europe, North America, and East Asia compared.

机译：各种区域经济制度化：欧洲，北美和东亚进行了比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

This study examines why different levels of economic institutional arrangements have been formed across three major economic regions: Europe, North America, and East Asia. We can identify three similarities in regional economic institutionalization across the three regions: (1) External pressures and challenges such as wars, financial crises, and severe region-wide economic downturns served as catalytic events for starting negotiations for a regional economic project; (2) Constructing a regional institution was a counterbalancing action vis-a-vis other major powers or regions; (3) Economic interests along with policy needs led to an interstate consensus on building a regional economic institution. In spite of these similarities, widely different institutional forms were produced across the three regions. My research illustrates that although power relations and economic interests have been at work, the policy ideas of key political actors who participated in major decisions on regional projects were the major determinants of divergent institutional arrangements across the three regions. In short, an idea-based approach better explains the varieties of regional economic institutionalization than power-based and interest-based ones, which are grounded in rational-functionalist logic.
机译：这项研究探讨了为什么在三个主要经济区：欧洲，北美和东亚形成了不同层次的经济体制安排。我们可以发现三个地区在区域经济制度化方面的三个相似之处：（1）战争，金融危机和整个地区严重的经济衰退等外部压力和挑战是启动区域经济项目谈判的催化剂。 （2）建立区域机构是对其他主要大国或地区的制衡行动； （3）经济利益与政策需求一起导致了州际对建立区域经济机构的共识。尽管存在这些相似之处，但在这三个地区产生了截然不同的体制形式。我的研究表明，尽管权力关系和经济利益一直在发挥作用，但参与区域项目重大决策的主要政治角色的政策构想却是决定三个地区制度安排差异的主要决定因素。简而言之，基于理性功能主义逻辑的基于思想的方法比基于权力和基于利益的方法更好地解释了区域经济制度化的多样性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Choi, Ji Young.;

  • 作者单位

    Purdue University.;

  • 授予单位 Purdue University.;
  • 学科 International law.;Public administration.;Political science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 192 p.
  • 总页数 192
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号