首页> 外文学位 >Comparing problem-based learning and lecture as methods to teach whole-systems design to engineering students.
【24h】

Comparing problem-based learning and lecture as methods to teach whole-systems design to engineering students.

机译:比较基于问题的学习和演讲作为向工程专业学生教授全系统设计的方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The objective of this research is to compare problem-based learning and lecture as methods to teach whole-systems design to engineering students. A case study, Appendix A, exemplifying successful whole-systems design was developed and written by the author in partnership with the Rocky Mountain Institute. Concepts to be tested were then determined, and a questionnaire was developed to test students' preconceptions. A control group of students was taught using traditional lecture methods, and a sample group of students was taught using problem-based learning methods. After several weeks, the students were given the same questionnaire as prior to the instruction, and the data was analyzed to determine if the teaching methods were effective in correcting misconceptions. A statistically significant change in the students' preconceptions was observed in both groups on the topic of cost related to the design process. There was no statistically significant change in the students' preconceptions concerning the design process, technical ability within five years, and the possibility of drastic efficiency gains with current technologies. However, the results were inconclusive in determining that problem-based learning is more effective than lecture as a method for teaching the concept of whole-systems design, or vice versa.
机译:这项研究的目的是将基于问题的学习和讲座作为向工程专业学生教授整个系统设计的方法进行比较。作者与落基山学院合作开发并撰写了一个案例研究附录A,该案例例证了成功的整个系统设计。然后确定要测试的概念,并开发出问卷以测试学生的先入为主。使用传统的讲课方法对对照组学生进行授课,并使用基于问题的学习方法对学生样本组进行授课。几周后,向学生提供与指导前相同的问卷,并分析数据以确定教学方法是否有效地纠正了误解。两组学生在与设计过程相关的成本方面,对成见都有统计学上的显着变化。在有关设计过程,五年内的技术能力以及使用当前技术获得巨大效率提高的可能性方面,学生的前瞻性在统计学上没有显着变化。但是,在确定基于问题的学习作为一种讲授整个系统设计概念的方法比讲课更有效时,结果尚无定论,反之亦然。

著录项

  • 作者

    Dukes, Michael Dickey.;

  • 作者单位

    Clemson University.;

  • 授予单位 Clemson University.;
  • 学科 Engineering General.;Education Sciences.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 87 p.
  • 总页数 87
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号