• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The Fair Information Principles: A comparison of U.S. and Canadian privacy policy as applied to the private sector.
【24h】

The Fair Information Principles: A comparison of U.S. and Canadian privacy policy as applied to the private sector.

机译：公平信息原则：比较适用于私营部门的美国和加拿大隐私政策。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

U.S. consumers are worried about their privacy and their personal information. High profile cases of identity theft involving companies losing the private information of hundreds of thousands of customers have only served to elevate the mistrust consumers have for companies that collect and share their personal information. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is charged with protecting U.S. consumers from fraud, deception, and unfair business practices in the marketplace; a task made difficult by an overarching need to balance the rights of the individuals against the security needs of the country and the free flow of information required by a free market economy.;The FTC has asked U.S. companies to follow the Fair Information Practices developed by the U.S. government in 1973, but does not require adherence to those standards. In Canada, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) was passed in 2000 to address the similar privacy concerns of their consumers. PIPEDA is based on the Fair Information Principles and requires that companies implement those principles.;The Privacy Policy Rating System (PPRS) has been developed for this thesis as a method of rating company privacy policies for how they compare to the Fair Information Principles. Using both the PPRS content analysis technique and a standard stakeholder analysis technique, company privacy policies in both countries are examined to address the question of which government's privacy policy is doing a better job of achieving the Fair Information Principles. The lessons learned in this comparison are used to formulate policy recommendations to improve U.S. privacy policy for better adherence among U.S. companies to the Fair Information Principles.
机译：美国消费者担心他们的隐私和个人信息。涉及公司丢失成千上万客户私人信息的身份盗用案件备受瞩目，这只会加剧消费者对收集和共享其个人信息的公司的不信任。联邦贸易委员会（FTC）负责保护美国消费者免受市场中的欺诈，欺骗和不公平商业行为的侵害；一项首要任务是平衡个人权利与国家安全需求和自由市场经济要求的信息自由流通之间的困难。联邦贸易委员会已要求美国公司遵循由美国政府制定的《公平信息惯例》。 1973年美国政府提出，但不要求遵守这些标准。在加拿大，2000年通过了《个人信息保护和电子文件法》（PIPEDA），以解决消费者的类似隐私问题。 PIPEDA建立在公平信息原则的基础上，要求公司执行这些原则。本文已开发了隐私策略评级系统（PPRS），作为对公司隐私政策与公平信息原则进行比较的一种方法。同时使用PPRS内容分析技术和标准的利益相关者分析技术，对这两个国家的公司隐私政策进行了审查，以解决哪个政府的隐私政策在实现公平信息原则方面做得更好的问题。从此比较中吸取的教训将用于制定政策建议，以改善美国隐私政策，使美国公司更好地遵守公平信息原则。

著录项

  • 作者

    Crounse, Shane.;

  • 作者单位

    Rochester Institute of Technology.;

  • 授予单位 Rochester Institute of Technology.;
  • 学科 Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 175 p.
  • 总页数 175
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号