• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Fair Share or Fair Play: The Bakke decision and affirmative action in the competitive race for higher education.
【24h】

Fair Share or Fair Play: The Bakke decision and affirmative action in the competitive race for higher education.

机译：公平分享或公平竞争：Bakke在高等教育竞争中的决定和平权行动。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The year 2008 marked not only the historic first-time nomination, and subsequent election of the first African American for the Presidency of the United States; it also represented the 30th anniversary of the landmark case of the Regents of the University of California versus Allan Bakke. The 1978 dispute involved a white medical school applicant, Bakke, who sued the university after receiving his second letter of rejection and learning the institution maintained a "special admission program", which held sixteen out of one hundred seats for underrepresented minority students. Bakke asserted that he was a victim of "reverse discrimination" because his overall test scores were higher than those of the minority students admitted as part of the "special program", concluding he was denied the opportunity to attend UCD because he was white. What followed was series of twists and turns culminating with Bakke's admittance into UCD, confusion on the part of universities across the country struggling to determine how the case would affect their missions as institutions of higher education, and a fractured Supreme Court, many would say country, forced to ask very tough questions about what equality really meant.;Thirty years later, debates continue to be filled with raw emotion with the average citizen acting as impassioned advocate for their respective side of the issue. In an attempt to offer a unique framework by which important questions about equality can be analyzed, social psychologist William Ryan offers two paradigms for the concept of equality and fairness, Fair Shares and Fair Play. According to Ryan, Fair Players, the most enduring viewpoint in America, support meritocracy and are resolute in their belief that every individual should have a right to pursue, but not necessarily attain happiness. Fair Sharers in contrast maintain that resources should be shared to ensure equality of rights to access. When high degrees of success are achieved by some racial minorities in America, it begs the question for Fair Players, is there still a need for affirmative action or are these achievements a testament to the success of the meritocracy? This thesis will apply Ryan's Fair Share, Fair Play context to the Bakke case to examine the values underlying both sides of the argument. In addition, the thesis will examine the outcomes of the Bakke case on admissions policies at selective colleges and universities to explore the need and the extent to which the policy is appropriate today.
机译：2008年不仅标志着历史性的首次提名，而且标志着第一位非裔美国人当选美国总统。这也标志着加利福尼亚大学摄政王与艾伦·巴克（Allan Bakke）一起具有里程碑意义的案件成立30周年。 1978年的纠纷涉及一名白人医学院的申请者巴克（Bakke），他在收到第二封拒绝书后起诉该大学，并得知该机构维持了“特殊录取计划”，该计划在少数族裔学生中占100个席位中的16个。 Bakke断言他是“反歧视”的受害者，因为他的总体考试成绩高于作为“特殊计划”一部分而被录取的少数族裔学生的总成绩，并得出结论，他是白人，被剥夺了参加UCD的机会。随之而来的是一系列的曲折，最终导致巴克入学，后来全国各地的大学都在为确定该案如何影响其作为高等教育机构的使命而感到困惑，以及最高法院的破裂，许多人会说，被迫问到关于平等的真正含义的非常棘手的问题。；三十年后，辩论继续充满了生机勃勃的情感，普通公民在各自问题的各个方面都表现出了热情洋溢的主张。为了提供一个独特的框架来分析有关平等的重要问题，社会心理学家威廉·赖安（William Ryan）为平等和公平的概念提供了两种范式，即公平份额和公平竞争。根据公平竞争者赖安（Ryan）的观点，这是美国最持久的观点，它支持英才制，并坚信每个人都应有追求的权利，但不一定获得幸福。相反，公平共享者主张应该共享资源以确保访问权的平等。当美国的少数族裔取得高度成功时，这便成为公平竞争者的问题，是否仍然需要采取平权行动，或者这些成就是否证明了精英统治的成功？本文将把Ryan的“公平份额，公平竞争”背景应用于Bakke案例，以检验论证双方的潜在价值。此外，本文还将研究有关选择性大学的招生政策的Bakke案的结果，以探讨该政策的必要性和适用程度。

著录项

  • 作者

    Duprey, Tara.;

  • 作者单位

    Georgetown University.;

  • 授予单位 Georgetown University.;
  • 学科 Education Higher.
  • 学位 M.A.L.S.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 96 p.
  • 总页数 96
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 高等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号