• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Reliability, validity, and equivalency of a computerized curriculum based measure for basic math skills.
【24h】

Reliability, validity, and equivalency of a computerized curriculum based measure for basic math skills.

机译：基于计算机课程的基本数学技能量度的可靠性，有效性和等效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Scope and Method of Study. This study examined the performance of third, fourth, and fifth graders on curriculum based measurements for math. The study sought to compare performance on two different computer formats to the traditional paper and pencil format. There were 133 initial participants and 80 participants after elimination for inaccuracy. Participants completed three each of the Paper/Pencil, Simulated Paper, and Flashcard probes. All probes were administered in a group format in a computer lab.;Findings and Conclusions. A significant interaction was demonstrated, F(4,160) = 4.65, p = .001, eta2 = .10, such that participants performance on the assessments varied based on grade level and assessment format. There was a main effect of grade, F(2,80) = 33.17, p .001, eta2 = .36, such that fifth graders obtained more digits correct than fourth graders and fourth graders obtained more digits correct than third graders. There was also a significant main effect for format, F(2,160) = 44.84, p .001, eta2 = .45, such that there were significant differences between performance on the various formats. Due to multiple levels of each factor, it is necessary to examine simple effects and simple contrasts to determine the location of the significant differences. Significant differences were found for all grades between all modes with the exception of two comparisons. A comparison of paper to computer paper for third graders yielded a significance of p = .080. A comparison of computer simulated paper to flashcard yielded for fourth graders yielded a significance of p = .067. Both of these almost reach significance indicating that the performance on the three methods of assessment is often significantly different regardless of grade. All three formats demonstrated excellent reliability and could be used to assess progress. However, the computer formats that were developed and used for this study were not found to be equivalent to paper and pencil method.
机译：研究范围和方法。这项研究检查了三年级，四年级和五年级学生在基于课程的数学测量中的表现。该研究试图将两种不同计算机格式的性能与传统纸张和铅笔格式的性能进行比较。最初有133名参与者，消除不准确性后有80名参与者。参与者分别完成了三个“纸张/铅笔”，“模拟纸张”和“抽认卡”探针。所有探针均以分组形式在计算机实验室中进行管理；发现和结论。证明了显着的交互作用，F（4,160）= 4.65，p = .001，eta2 = .10，因此，参与者在评估中的表现会因年级和评估形式而异。成绩的主要影响因素是F（2,80）= 33.17，p <.001，eta2 = .36，因此，五年级学生比四年级学生获得更多的正确数字，四年级学生比三年级学生获得更多的正确数字。对于格式，还有一个重要的主要影响，F（2,160）= 44.84，p <.001，eta2 = .45，因此，各种格式的性能之间存在显着差异。由于每个因素的水平较高，因此有必要检查简单的效果和简单的对比以确定明显差异的位置。除两次比较外，所有模式之间的所有年级均存在显着差异。三年级学生的纸与计算机纸的比较得出p = .080的显着性。比较计算机模拟纸和四年级学生的成绩单，得出的显着性为p = .067。这两个指标几乎都达到了显着水平，表明这三种评估方法的绩效通常显着不同，而与年级无关。所有这三种格式均显示出极好的可靠性，可用于评估进度。但是，该研究开发和使用的计算机格式并不等同于纸张和铅笔方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wong, Cassandra Brenner.;

  • 作者单位

    Oklahoma State University.;

  • 授予单位 Oklahoma State University.;
  • 学科 Education Mathematics.;Education Curriculum and Instruction.;Education Technology of.;Education Elementary.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 75 p.
  • 总页数 75
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号