• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The Bordes-Binford debate: Transatlantic interpretive traditions in Paleolithic archaeology.
【24h】

The Bordes-Binford debate: Transatlantic interpretive traditions in Paleolithic archaeology.

机译：Bordes-Binford辩论：旧石器时代考古学中的跨大西洋解释传统。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

In the 1960s, Lewis Binford, a young American archaeologist, challenged Francois Bordes, a venerable French prehistorian, over the interpretation of a taxonomy Bordes had developed to describe stone tools of the European Middle Paleolithic period (Mousterian). Ostensibly about the meaning of variability in Mousterian stone tool assemblages, the Bordes-Binford debate exposed a deep rift in the field of archaeology about how the deep past should be studied and interpreted. The intellectual clash has been cast subsequently in dichotomous terms: old versus young, descriptive versus explanatory, idiographic versus nomothetic, Old World versus New World. The Bordes-Binford debate, however, was not merely a singular event in the intellectual history of Paleolithic archaeology. It is the main thesis of this work that the Bordes-Binford debate is emblematic of the differing traditions within the discipline of archaeology as it was practiced by American and French scholars and that an understanding of the debate furthers understanding of how archaeology developed and is practiced and conceptualized in those countries today. To that extent, the Bordes-Binford debate is best understood in its transatlantic context; that is, it grew out of an encounter and exchange between protagonists who were profoundly influenced by their respective national and cultural experiences. The debate and its aftermath changed the practice of Paleolithic archaeology on both sides of the Atlantic.
机译：1960年代，年轻的美国考古学家刘易斯·本福德（Lewis Binford）挑战了一位尊敬的法国史前史学家弗朗索瓦·鲍德斯（Francois Bordes），他对分类学的解释是由鲍德斯描述的，用以描述欧洲旧石器时代中期的石器。显而易见，关于穆斯特石器组合的可变性的含义，Bordes-Binford的辩论暴露了考古学领域关于如何研究和解释深渊的深刻裂痕。知识分子的冲突随后被分为两类：老与年轻，描述性与解释性，具体字形与非宗教性，旧世界与新世界。但是，Bordes-Binford辩论不仅是旧石器时代考古学史上的一个奇异事件。这项工作的主要论点是，鲍德斯·本福德的辩论象征着美国和法国学者实践考古学领域内不同传统的象征，对辩论的理解进一步促进了人们对考古学的发展和实践的理解。并在当今这些国家中进行了概念化。从这个意义上讲，在跨大西洋的背景下，对鲍德斯-宾福德辩论的最好理解。也就是说，它源于受到各自民族和文化经历深刻影响的主角之间的交往和交流。辩论及其后果改变了大西洋两岸的旧石器时代考古学实践。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wargo, Melissa Canady.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Texas at Arlington.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Texas at Arlington.;
  • 学科 Anthropology Archaeology.;History Modern.;History of Science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 160 p.
  • 总页数 160
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 古人类学;自然科学史;现代史（1917年~）;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:38:30

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号