首页> 外文学位 >Development of the US Environmental Protection Agency's approach to community involvement from the inception of superfund in 1980 thorough 2009: Case studies of the Tar Creek and Libby, Montana Superfund Sites.
【24h】

Development of the US Environmental Protection Agency's approach to community involvement from the inception of superfund in 1980 thorough 2009: Case studies of the Tar Creek and Libby, Montana Superfund Sites.

机译:从1980年至2009年成立超级基金以来,美国环境保护署对社区参与的方法的发展:蒙大拿州超级河岸塔尔溪和利比的案例研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Since its inception, an important component of the EPA Superfund Program has been public participation. In the early days of the Program, this was more closely akin to 'community relations' but this has changed over time. The impact of the Superfund cleanup process primarily has local effects; therefore members of the affected communities deserve an opportunity to participate in decision-making regarding cleanup. This thesis analyzed relevant literature, and presents case studies of community involvement at the Libby Asbestos and Tar Creek Superfund Sites. This thesis argues that a Community Involvement Coordinator and the EPA Superfund Team can meet all the regulatory requirements for public participation and still fail to connect with the affected community. The findings of this thesis suggest that raising the bar on what is required by regulation for Superfund community involvement would ensure a more universal application across the country. A formal change to Superfund regulations on community involvement would help assure equal treatment of affected communities.
机译:自成立以来,EPA超级基金计划的重要组成部分就是公众参与。在该计划的初期,这更类似于“社区关系”,但是随着时间的流逝而改变。超级基金清理流程的影响主要是局部影响;因此,受影响社区的成员应有机会参与有关清理的决策。本文分析了相关文献,并介绍了利比石棉和塔尔克里克超级基金站点的社区参与案例研究。本文认为,社区参与协调员和EPA超级基金团队可以满足公众参与的所有法规要求,但仍无法与受影响的社区建立联系。本论文的研究结果表明,提高对超级基金社区参与的法规要求的标准将确保在全国范围内更广泛地应用。正式更改有关社区参与的超级基金法规将有助于确保对受影响社区的平等待遇。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号