• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Environmental Sciences >Framing Contests in Environmental Decision-making: A Case Study of the Tar Creek (Oklahoma) Superfund Site
【24h】

Framing Contests in Environmental Decision-making: A Case Study of the Tar Creek (Oklahoma) Superfund Site

机译：环境决策中的框架竞赛：Tar Creek（俄克拉何马州）超级基金站点的案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

Problem statement: Stakeholder involvement processes have become an important component of environmental decision-making. This study investigated the role that stakeholders operating outside of official stakeholder processes may play in influencing the policy environment. An improved understanding of the public and political influences on environmental policy decisions contributes to the development of more effective and legitimate policies. Approach: We utilized frame analysis to reveal the emergence and communication of competing narratives (problem and solution frames) among citizen groups at the Tar Creek Superfund Site and how these frames influenced the political dialogue surrounding remediation decisions at the site. The data used in the analysis was drawn from extensive fieldwork in the Tar Creek communities, document analysis and in-depth interviews with 53 individual stakeholders. Results: Three competing frames were articulated and advanced by three groups of Tar Creek residents. We demonstrate that each of the three groups altered the policy debate and influenced the actions of politicians, which in turn impacted remediation policy decisions. Evidence suggests that all three groups were able to significantly affect policy decisions, although the magnitude of their influence differed. Conclusion/Recommendations: The results showed that public framing may play a critical role in influencing environmental policy decisions. Understanding how stakeholder framing can impact the overall context of environmental decisions will allow policymakers to better respond to stakeholder concerns in a way that benefits the policy making process as well as policy outcomes.
机译：问题陈述：利益相关者的参与过程已成为环境决策的重要组成部分。这项研究调查了在正式利益相关者流程之外运作的利益相关者在影响政策环境中可能扮演的角色。对公众和政治对环境政策决定影响的更好理解有助于制定更有效和合法的政策。方法：我们使用框架分析来揭示Tar Creek超级基金站点上公民群体之间竞争性叙述（问题和解决方案框架）的出现和交流，以及这些框架如何影响围绕该站点的补救决策的政治对话。分析中使用的数据来自Tar Creek社区的广泛田野调查，文档分析以及对53个利益相关者的深入访谈。结果：三个小组的Tar Creek居民清楚地表达了三个竞争的框架。我们证明，这三个小组分别改变了政策辩论并影响了政客的行动，进而影响了补救政策的决策。有证据表明，尽管这三个群体的影响程度不同，但它们都能显着影响政策决策。结论/建议：结果表明，公共框架在影响环境政策决策中可能起关键作用。了解利益相关者框架如何影响环境决策的整体背景，将使决策者能够以有利于决策过程和政策成果的方式更好地响应利益相关者的关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号