首页> 外文学位 >Mobile device reading interventions in the kindergarten classroom.
【24h】

Mobile device reading interventions in the kindergarten classroom.

机译:幼儿园教室中的移动设备阅读干预措施。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

With a recent increase in technology access in America's schools and combined with No Child Left Behind's (NCLB) charge to ensure that every child is literate by third grade, schools have been using technology tools to teach students the foundational skills to become fluid and able readers. This study examined the use of mobile device reading interventions in the kindergarten classroom. Essentially this study included 292 kindergarten students who received varying amounts of mobile device reading interventions specifically created for the school district where the study took place.;In an attempt to fill a void of the lack of quantitative research using mobile devices in the primary grades, this causal comparative research design study used analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine if there was a statistically significant difference between those students who used mobile device reading interventions and those who received traditional reading interventions.;The data analysis revealed similar findings uncovered in the researcher's literature review for computer-assisted instruction. Essentially, when the mobile device reading intervention students were compared with the traditional reading intervention students, the students who used the mobile devices statistically outperformed the others on the DIBELS Word Use Fluency (p=.037), Phoneme Segmentation Fluency (p=.005), and Nonsense Word Fluency (p=.015). Also the females that used the mobile devices statistically outperformed the males who used the mobile devices in Word Use Fluency (p=.038).;When the varying amounts of mobile device use (no use, some use and many use) were compared, the data revealed a similar trend. Those students in the many use category statistically outperformed the students in the some category on all the DIBELS mid-year sub-tests (ISF -- p=.000, LNF -- p=.000, WUF -- p=.008, PSF -- p=.000, NWF -- p=.000). There also was a significant finding when the many use category was compared with the none category in LNF (p=.044), PSF (p=.000), and NWF (p=.000). Next, when the data was analyzed between the none and some categories, those students in the none range statistically performed better in LNF (p=.000), PSF (p=.013), and NWF (p=.000).;The implications of these findings suggest that the use of mobile devices can effectively teach kindergarten students the foundational skills to become fluent and able readers. However, the students in this study fared better when they used the mobile devices either a lot or not at all.
机译:随着美国学校技术获取的增加,再加上“不让任何一个孩子落后”(NCLB)的收费,以确保每个孩子都能读到三年级,学校一直在使用技术工具来教给学生基本的技能,使他们成为能动人和能干的读者。这项研究检查了幼儿园教室中移动设备阅读干预措施的使用。本质上,该研究包括292名幼儿园学生,他们接受了专门针对进行研究的学区而设计的各种移动设备阅读干预措施。为了填补缺乏使用小学三年级移动设备进行定量研究的空白,这项因果的比较研究设计研究使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)和方差分析(ANOVA)来确定使用移动设备阅读干预的学生与接受传统阅读干预的学生之间是否存在统计学上的显着差异。揭示了在研究人员针对计算机辅助教学的文献综述中发现的类似发现。本质上,当将移动设备阅读干预学生与传统阅读干预学生进行比较时,使用移动设备的学生在DIBELS单词使用流畅度(p = .037),音素分割流畅度(p = .005)上在统计上优于其他学生。 )和无意义字流畅度(p = .015)。同样,在Word Use Fluency中,使用移动设备的女性在统计学上优于使用移动设备的男性(p = .038)。当比较了不同数量的移动设备使用情况(不使用,某些使用和许多使用)时,数据显示出类似的趋势。在所有DIBELS年中子测验中,处于“许多使用”类别的学生在统计上均优于某些类别的学生(ISF-p = .000,LNF-p = .000,WWF-p = .008, PSF-p = .000,NWF-p = .000)。当将LNF(p = .044),PSF(p = .000)和NWF(p = .000)中的“多用途”类别与“无”类别进行比较时,还有一个重大发现。接下来,当在无类别和某些类别之间分析数据时,无类别的那些学生在统计学上表现出更好的LNF(p = .000),PSF(p = .013)和NWF(p = .000)。这些发现的含义表明,使用移动设备可以有效地向幼儿园学生传授成为流利和有能力的读者的基本技能。但是,本研究的学生在大量使用移动设备或根本不使用移动设备时表现更好。

著录项

  • 作者

    Fishburn, Todd A.;

  • 作者单位

    Wilmington University (Delaware).;

  • 授予单位 Wilmington University (Delaware).;
  • 学科 Education Reading.;Education Technology of.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2009
  • 页码 239 p.
  • 总页数 239
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号