• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >Internal and external institutional dynamics in member-states and ASEAN: Tracing creation, change and reciprocal influences.
【24h】

Internal and external institutional dynamics in member-states and ASEAN: Tracing creation, change and reciprocal influences.

机译：成员国和东盟的内部和外部制度动力：追寻创造，变化和相互影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

ASEAN (the Association of the Southeast Asian Nations) continues to have its significance contested in debates characterized by rigid paradigmatism and inabilities to account for institutional change. This dissertation argues that processes of state-building and international organizational development must be examined to understand Southeast Asian relations. It uses an eclectic theoretical framework drawn from political science, area studies, historiography and sociological institutionalism.;Longitudinal comparative case studies and process-tracing show that from 1967 to the 1980s, ASEAN complemented newly-independent states' objectives. Over time, this complementarity began to diminish as the members' state-building paths diverged, new bureaucratic groups within ASEAN developed their own interests, and varied institutional momentums intersected.;The three case studies---the haze, a regional human rights mechanism, and East Timor's independence---showed that: (1) crises catalyzed but did not determine change; (2) coalitions of actors accounted for the content of institutional change; (3) path-dependent processes influenced the nature and extent of change; and (4) the layered nature of change engendered more tensions within an institution.;As for the institutions' reciprocal dynamics, the dissertation found that member-states' foundational principles and governance needs constituted and regulated ASEAN. State-building processes shaped policy-makers' interpretive frames to view ASEAN as a diplomatic vehicle with extra-regional powers and later, a limited agent for domestic change and regional governance. ASEAN also shaped the interpretive frames of both state and non-state actors, and regulated some state actions without formal mechanisms. ASEAN's constitutive influence included reinforcing government policies, deepening divisions among domestic organizations, building governance capacities, and a forum for debate led by non-state actors.;This framework explains both internal and external dynamics of institutions. In presenting a model of institutional creation and change, it argues that over time, an institution's processes for self-reproduction and adaptations lead to tensions that are necessary for change. It likewise says that member-states and ASEAN constitute, regulate and provide interpretive frames for each other.;Ultimately, this dissertation demonstrates that institutional resilience and development result from the interaction of structure, agency and contingency.
机译：东盟（东南亚国家联盟）在僵化的范式主义和无力应对制度变迁的辩论中继续发挥其重要性。本文认为，必须研究国家建设和国际组织发展的过程，以了解东南亚关系。它使用了从政治学，领域研究，史学和社会学制度主义中得出的折衷的理论框架。纵向的比较案例研究和过程追踪表明，从1967年到1980年代，东盟补充了新独立国家的目标。随着时间的流逝，随着成员国家建立道路的分歧，东盟内部新的官僚集团发展自己的利益以及不同的机构势头，这种互补性开始减弱。三个案例研究-阴霾，一种区域人权机制，以及东帝汶的独立性———表明：（1）危机促成但没有决定改变； （2）行动者联盟负责制度变革的内容； （3）路径依赖过程影响变化的性质和程度； （4）变革的分层性质在机构内部产生了更多的紧张关系。关于机构的相互动力，论文发现成员国的基本原则和治理需求构成并规范了东盟。国家建设进程塑造了政策制定者的解释框架，将东盟视为具有区域外权力的外交工具，后来又成为国内变革和区域治理的有限推动者。东盟还塑造了国家和非国家行为者的解释框架，并规范了一些没有正式机制的国家行为。东盟的构成性影响包括加强政府政策，加深国内组织之间的分歧，建设治理能力以及由非国家行为者牵头的辩论论坛;该框架解释了机构的内部和外部动力。在提出制度创新和变革的模型时，它认为随着时间的流逝，制度的自我复制和适应过程会导致变革所必需的紧张关系。同样，它说成员国与东盟相互之间构成，规范和提供解释框架。最终，本文证明了制度的复原力和发展是结构，代理和偶然性相互作用的结果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ortuoste, Maria Consuelo C.;

  • 作者单位

    Arizona State University.;

  • 授予单位 Arizona State University.;
  • 学科 History Asia Australia and Oceania.;Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 472 p.
  • 总页数 472
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号