• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >The confluence of parental attributions, parental levels of empathy, and parental stress on risk of child maltreatment.
【24h】

The confluence of parental attributions, parental levels of empathy, and parental stress on risk of child maltreatment.

机译：父母的归因，父母的同情水平和父母对儿童虐待风险的压力合计。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between several factors that predict parental risk for child abuse. This research explored how parental levels of empathy, parental attributions of their child's behavior, and parental stress combine to predict parental risk. The first objective was to explain the confluence of these factors. The second was to test for differences, if any, in the confluence of these factors by gender. The third was to provide recommendations for counselors, therapists, and counselor educators on assessment strategies that incorporate these factors to recognize risk of child physical abuse.;One hundred and twenty-five parents completed the Child Abuse Prevention Inventory (CAPI), the Adult-Adolescent Parent Inventory (AAPI-2), the Parental Stress Inventory/Short Form (PSI/SF), and the Parental Attribution Test/Revised (PAT/R). The CAPI scores served as a continuous variable to designate potential to abuse and a dichotomous variable to designate the parents by groups as high-risk, at-risk, and low-risk for abuse. Data analyses were designed to test for relationships among the variables, to test for group differences on the criterion variable, to determine which of the three factors, in which linear combination, best predict child abuse potential, and to test for gender differences.;For these parents, there were significant differences between the low-risk, at-risk, and high-risk groups on perceived total stress. The total stress increased as risk increased. The between group differences on parental empathy were also significant; however, the mean differences were only significant between the low-risk and high-risk groups. For the total group, the regression analysis for PSI/SF parental distress, empathy, and attributions predicted 41.9% of the potential risk, empathy and attributions were not significant. There were differences on gender. For these fathers, total stress was the only significant predictor of potential risk for abuse. However, with personal distress in the regression rather than total stress, all the independent variables contributed significantly to the prediction of risk for the mothers such that as distress increased, empathy decreased, and attributions of perceived child control increased. There was a significant difference in the contribution to risk of personal distress for the women as compared to the men. The implication for counselors and therapists is that mothers at-risk of abuse may exhibit greater personal distress and elevated levels of emotionality than fathers. The differences may be attributable to a difference in the way meanings are constructed and processed for stress by gender.
机译：这项研究的目的是调查预测父母虐待儿童风险的几个因素之间的关系。这项研究探索了父母的同情水平，孩子行为的父母属性以及父母的压力如何共同预测父母的风险。第一个目标是解释这些因素的融合。第二是测试这些因素在性别融合方面是否存在差异。第三是向咨询师，治疗师和咨询师教育者提供有关评估策略的建议，这些策略应考虑到这些因素，以识别儿童遭受身体虐待的风险。125名家长完成了《防止虐待儿童清单》（CAPI），《青少年父母库存（AAPI-2），父母压力库存/简短表格（PSI / SF）和父母归因测试/修订（PAT / R）。 CAPI分数是一个连续变量，用于指定潜在的虐待风险；而CAPI得分则是一个二元变量，用于按组将父母指定为受虐待的高风险，高风险和低风险。数据分析旨在测试变量之间的关系，测试标准变量上的组差异，确定三个因素中的哪一个，在哪个线性组合中最好地预测儿童受虐的可能性以及测试性别差异。在这些父母中，低风险组，高风险组和高风险组在感知总压力上存在显着差异。总压力随着风险增加而增加。父母同理心之间的群体差异也很明显；但是，平均差异仅在低风险和高风险组之间显着。对于整个组，对PSI / SF父母的困扰，同情和归因的回归分析预测，潜在风险，同情和归因的41.9％并不显着。性别上存在差异。对于这些父亲，总压力是潜在的潜在虐待风险的唯一重要预测指标。然而，由于个人痛苦而不是总压力的回归，所有独立变量都对预测母亲的风险做出了重大贡献，例如随着痛苦的增加，同理心的减少以及对儿童控制感的归属增加。与男性相比，女性对个人困扰风险的贡献存在显着差异。对辅导员和治疗师的影响是，与父亲相比，处于虐待风险中的母亲可能表现出更大的个人困扰和更高的情感水平。差异可能归因于为性别强调而构造和处理含义的方式上的差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rosenstein, Paula.;

  • 作者单位

    Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi.;

  • 授予单位 Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi.;
  • 学科 Education Guidance and Counseling.;Psychology Clinical.;Social Work.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 244 p.
  • 总页数 244
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号