• 主题
高级搜索  >
历史搜索 清空历史
首页> 外文学位 >A comparison of the religious activity of mainline and non-mainline institutions of higher education in the southeastern United States.
【24h】

A comparison of the religious activity of mainline and non-mainline institutions of higher education in the southeastern United States.

机译：美国东南部主要和非主要高等教育机构的宗教活动比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
页面导航
  • 摘要
  • 著录项
  • 相似文献
  • 相关主题

摘要

The differences in religious and spiritual activity on mainline and non-mainline religiously affiliated campuses were investigated. The activity was measured through documentary analysis of college catalogs and other official publications of the institution. Inquiry was conducted in the Academic Affairs and Student Affairs Divisions to identify institutional policies and positions related to religious expression. The results indicated that mainline institutions focused primarily on knowledge as a form of religious expression, but not to the degree found at non-mainline institutions. Non-mainline institutions also recorded higher expressions of orthodoxy, communalism, ethicalism, and consequentialism than did mainline institutions. The findings are evidence that mainline colleges and universities do educate their students in aspects of religion and spirituality, but they do so differently than non-mainline institutions.;Further testing is warranted in order to determine if the findings extended to populations not included in the study, such as geographic areas outside the southeastern US, and to measure the religiosity of individual students who attend these institutions. The official policies and actual religious practice on campus may differ considerably.;Additional research will now focus on the purpose and function of mainline colleges and universities and their unique role within higher education. These findings will aid in ensuring continued viability and vitality for these institutions in the years to come.
机译：调查了主干和非主干宗教附属校园在宗教和精神活动上的差异。该活动是通过对大学目录和该机构其他官方出版物的文献分析来衡量的。在学术事务和学生事务部门进行了调查，以确定与宗教表达有关的机构政策和职位。结果表明，主流机构主要集中于作为宗教表达形式的知识，但没有达到非主流机构所能达到的程度。非主流机构也比主流机构记录了更多的正统，共产主义，伦理主义和结果主义表达。该发现证明主线大学确实在宗教和灵性方面对学生进行了教育，但与非主线机构的教育方式有所不同。；有必要进行进一步的测试，以确定结果是否扩展到未包括在人群中的人群。研究（例如美国东南部以外的地理区域），并衡量参加这些机构的个别学生的宗教信仰。校园中的官方政策和实际的宗教实践可能有很大的不同。；附加研究现在将集中于主流大学的目的和功能及其在高等教育中的独特作用。这些发现将有助于确保这些机构在未来几年中继续保持活力和活力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pridgeon, Jeremy Kimble.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Alabama.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Alabama.;
  • 学科 Education Higher Education Administration.;Education Religious.;Education Administration.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 249 p.
  • 总页数 249
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱：kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备：11010802029741号 ICP备案号：京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有

  • 客服微信

  • 服务号