平衡各方利益为解决企业破产中的知识产权许可合同问题提供了理论支点.实践中,传统的待履行合同方法因未能顾及知识产权的特性而难以有效解决这一问题.美国允许被许可人在许可人破产、破产管理人拒绝履行合同时继续使用知识产权,而对被许可人破产时破产管理人能否承担知识产权许可合同义务有"假设性测试""真实性测试""字面含义测试"三种解决方法的争议.借鉴国外经验,结合我国实际情况,我国应在破产法司法解释或相关法规中构建企业破产中的知识产权许可合同法律制度.%Balancing the interests of all parties is a theoretical fulcrum to solve the conflict between the intellectual property law and the bankruptcy law.In practice, the traditional way to deal with the performance of the contract is failure to take into account the characteristics of intellectual property rights.The United States allows the licensee to use the intellectual property rights when the licensor goes bankrupt or the bankruptcy administrator refuses to perform the contract, and three being three methods of "hypothesis test", "authenticity test" and "literal meaning test" to balance whether the bankruptcy administrator can undertake the license contract.China needs to build up the legal system of intellectual property license contract in bankruptcy law, including judicial interpretation or other regulations.
展开▼
