2017年成都市办理的一起未经兽医执业注册而进行犬只声带切除的行政处罚案件,引发了笔者对动物诊疗机构监督执法中"动物诊疗"范畴界定、动物诊疗许可证申请对象探究、"一事不再罚"原则的适用、"责令停业诊疗活动"与"责令停产停业"区别等问题的思考.本文以法学理论和相关法律规定为基础,对成都市动物诊疗机构执法实践的疑点与难点进行分析,提出执法人员应更准确适用法律法规,并呼吁尽快建立全国执业兽医查询系统的建议.%In 2017,a case of removing dogs' vocal cords conducted by people without registration of licensed veterinarians was investigated by the authority of Chengdu City. Based on this case,some thoughts were triggered about the problems encountered in supervision and law enforcement of animal clinics,including how to define the scope of animal diagnosis and treatment,the exploration and research on people who shall be applicants required to get the animal clinic licenses,and the application of the non-repeated penalty principle,as well as the differentiation of suspending business and suspending production and business. In this article,by referring to the legal theory and related laws and regulations,the mentioned doubts and difficulties were analyzed and discussed,and two pieces of advice were proposed,which including law enforcement officials should apply the law more precisely,and establishing a national query system for licensed veterinarians as soon as possible.
展开▼
