ObjectiveAnalysis the curative effect of different operation methods on patients with anal fissures.Methods Selected of 30 cases of anal fissure patients in our hospital from 2014 January to June 2014 as the research object, randomly assigned to the control group and the experimental group, the control group was given anal ifssure side resection, local excision treatment, while the patients in the experimental group received anal sinus local incision, local lesion resection in treatment of anal fissure, then compared the two groups of patients with treatment effect. Results Patients in the experimental group of dysuria, pain degree, blood in the stool was signiifcantly lower than the control group, with statistically significant difference and their inspection (P<0.05).ConclusionFor comprehensive examination and analysis of patients with anal ifssure, and rational therapies in accordance with the characteristics of the disease, not only can effectively improve the clinical detection index of patients, but also can reduce the incidence rate of adverse reactions, so it is worth promoting in clinical practice.%目的：分析不同手术方法对肛裂患者的临床治疗效果。方法选用了我院在2014年1月～2014年6月接收的30例肛裂患者作为研究对象，将其随机分为对照组和实验组，对照组给予肛裂侧切术＋局部病灶切除治疗，而实验组患者给予肛窦局部切开＋肛裂局部病灶切除治疗，然后对两组患者的治疗效果进行对比。结果实验组患者的排尿困难、疼痛度、便血发生率明显低于对照组，并且他们检查的差异具有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论对肛裂患者进行全面的检查和分析，并根据其病情特点选择合理的治疗方法，不仅可以有效改善患者的临床检测指标，而且还能降低不良反应的发生率。
展开▼
