Objective To explore and discusses the difference Clinical effect on apply in splenic artetial embolization and splenorrhaphy to treatment of traumatic ruputure. Methods Selected 60 cases with splenic rupture from 2012 June to 2014 January in our hospital as the research object, randomly divided into two groups, each group of 30. group A were treated with splenic arterial embolization, group B were treated with splenorrhaphy, compared with the clinical effects of two groups . Results The clinical efifcacy on patients was higher than that the group B, P<0.05,had difference statistically signiifcance. Conclusion Splenic artetial embolization for the treatment of traumatic rupture of spleen disease method, obvious curative effect.%目的：探究和讨论应用脾动脉栓塞术和脾破裂修补术治疗外伤性脾破裂的临床效果差异。方法选取我院收治的自2012年6月～2014年1月60例外伤性脾破裂患者作为研究对象，按信封法随机分为两组，每组患者30例。A组采用脾动脉栓塞术法进行治疗，B组采用脾破裂修补术法进行治疗，比较两组患者的临床效果。结果 A组的临床疗效高于B组，P＜0.05，差异具有统计学意义。结论应用脾动脉栓塞术法治疗外伤性脾破裂疾病，疗效显著。
展开▼
