Objective To understand the quality of life among people in military institute, to find out the related influencing factors and lay a relevant course of health management Methods A total of 129 people were inquired and as-sessed with SF - 36 Chinese Edition questionnaires. Results It was satisfied with Cronbach' s a which is 0. 73. Compare with people of model, the score of physical function (PF) , vitality (VT) , mental health ( MH) in younger group was higher, which was (95. 4 ± 17. 0) , (72. 2 ± 13. 0) and (70. 2 ± 14. 3) , respectively, whereas bodily pain (BP) ,role-e-motional (RE) score was lower. In elder group the score of PF、 general health (GH), VT, social functioning (SF), MH was higher than people of model, which was (89. 3 ±8.7) ,(65.7 ±15. 8) ,(89.2 ± 12. 8) and (72. 6 ±16. 7), re-spectively (P <0. 01). Male, full of sleeping, working in office was positive related with quality of life (P <0. 05 or P < 0. 01). Conclusion Quality of life was appreciated among people in military institute and it was associated with sex, sleeping,, research working. It is necessary to strengthen health education in younger group of military institute.%目的 了解某军队研究所人员的生活质量状况,分析可能的影响因素,以制定针对性的健康管理策略.方法 采用SF-36量表中文版对所内129名人员进行问卷调查,参照国际生活质量评价项目的标准程序,进行研究和分析.结果 本研究SF-36量表中文版的Cronbach's α系数为0.73;与中国常模比较,青年组躯体健康(PF)、精力健康(VT)、心理健康(MH)的评分结果较高,分别为(95.4±17.0)分、(72.2±13.0)分和(70.2±14.3)分,而躯体疼痛(BP)、情绪角色功能(RE)的评分较低,中年组PF、总体健康(GH)、VT、社会功能(SF)、MH的评分结果分别为(89.3±8.7)分、(65.7±15.8)分、(73.8±16.5)分、(89.2±12.8)分和(72.6±16.7)分,均明显高于中年常模(P＜0.0l);男性、睡眠充足、在机关工作与生命质量正相关(P＜0.05或P＜0.01).结论 军队研究所人员总体的健康状况较好,性别、睡眠、工作性质是目前影响身体和心理健康的主要因素,要加强对青年慢性病患病人群的健康教育.
展开▼
