In this paper, three kinds of groundwater sampling are comparatively analyzed. Through systematically analyzes of the monitoring data, the significant differences in basic parameters, ions, metals, VOCs and, Sensory indexes of water sampling from the three methods are presented, and proposed the applicability of different methods. The results indicate that, the low⁃flow sampling,as compared to traditional methods, can effectively solve aeration in the sampling process, reduce the sample turbidity with small disturbance, minimize drawdown of the water table, avoid cross contamination resulting from mixing of different formation water with stagnant water in the well, save field time and eliminate sewage treatment costs associated with well purging and sampling. The Low⁃Flow sampling method is more advantage in taking representative samples.%选取3种地下水采样方法开展方法比对研究。通过系统分析监测数据，指出了3种方法所采水样在基本水质参数、无机离子、金属、挥发性有机物以及感官类指标等项目监测上的显著差异，指出了各种方法的适用性并分析原因。结果表明：与贝勒管法、潜水泵法相比，低流速法有效地解决了采样操作过程中易产生的曝气问题；对井内水体扰动较小，降低了水样浊度；减小了井内水位的大幅度泄降，避免了不同层位间污染物的迁移及周边水和井内滞水的交叉污染；节约了场地操作时间和后期污水处理所需花费。因此，低流速法在采取代表性水质样品方面更具方法优势。
展开▼
