Objective To analyze cervical cancer screening results, analyze the impact of cognitive differences among patients on cervical cancer screening results, and provide a reference for the early diagnosis of cervical cancer.Methods 20033 cases that received examination in our hospital in 2014, were divided into high cognitive group (12435 patients) and low cognitive group (7598 patients). Compare and analyze the prevalence of cervical disease, the rate of precancerous lesions and the incidence of cervical cancer between two groups.Results Among 20033 cases of physical examination, there were 7 cases of cervical cancer, 32 cases of CIN1, 25 cases of C1N2, 37 cases of C1N3. The morbidity of C1N1 and C1N2 showed no statistically signiifcant difference between the two groups (P>0.05); the incidence of C1N3 and cervical cancer in high-cognitive group (1.45‰, 0.24‰) were lower than low-cognitive group (2.50‰, 0.66‰)(P<0.05).Conclusion The cervical cancer screening showed that the incidence of cervical cancer in the region is about 0.40‰ and higher cervical cancer prevention knowledge and awareness can reduce the incidence of cervical cancer and C1N3.%目的：对宫颈癌筛查分析，分析宫颈癌认知差异妇女对宫颈癌筛查结果的影响，为宫颈癌早期诊断提供参考。方法选择2014年于本院体检的患者20033例，按照对宫颈癌防治知识认知差异，分为高认知组和低认知组。高认知组患者12435例，低认知组患者7598例。对比分析两组女性的宫颈疾患率、癌前病变率及宫颈癌发病率。结果2014年体检人数20033例，宫颈癌7例，CIN1期32例，C1N2期25例，C1N3期37例。C1N1、C1N2发病率，两组间相比无差异（P＞0.05）；C1N3、宮颈癌发病率组间相比，高认知组（1.45‰，0.24‰）低于低认知组（2.50‰，0.66‰）（P＜0.05）。结论宫颈癌筛查显示，本地区宫颈癌发病率约为0.40‰，较高的宫颈癌防治知识认知能够降低C1N3及宫颈癌发病率，因此本文为临床宫颈癌防治和早期筛查提供参考。
展开▼
