The judgements of UNIQLO trademark infringement cases by courts in different part of China indicates that people hold different opinions on the regulation of hoarding registered trademark for profits.Based on the analysis of the connotation of hoarding registered trademark for profit,the paper argues that it needs to satisfy three requirements to constitute hoarding registered trademark for profits.It goes against the purpose of the Trademark Law in protecting trademark right to hoard trademarks for profit.Such a practice greatly distorts the trademark registration system of our country,and should be regulated according to laws.However,there are loopholes in China's Trademark Law in regulating the hoarding of trademarks for profits.The principle of good faith empowers judges certain discretion to make up the loopholes in laws.It is therefore advisable to regulate the hoarding trademarks for profits by the principle of good faith,which is stipulated in article 7 (1) of the Trademark Law.Hence,the claim for maintaining the trademarks should be rejected..%通过介绍我国各地法院所判决的优衣库商标侵权纠纷案,发现人们对囤积商标牟利行为的规制还存在着不同观点.在分析囤积商标牟利内涵的基础上,论证构成囤积商标牟利行为需满足三个条件.囤积商标牟利行为与商标法保护商标权的本质相悖,导致我国的注册商标制度被严重异化,危害性极大,应依法予以规制.我国商标法对囤积商标牟利行为的规制存在着漏洞,诚实信用原则具有赋予法官自由裁量权以弥补法律漏洞的功能,故应依据我国《商标法》第7条第1款所规定的诚实信用原则来规制囤积商标牟利行为,直接驳回该行为人提起的商标维权的诉讼请求.
展开▼
