帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪中的“明知”仅包括“明确知道”，不包括“应当知道”。判定为网络知识产权犯罪活动提供帮助犯罪行为中的“明知”时可以充分运用刑事推定，但行为人有证据证明确实不知道所帮助对象从事信息网络知识产权犯罪的除外。该罪中的“犯罪”不是指具备全部犯罪构成要件意义上的犯罪，而是指犯罪行为意义上的犯罪，因而不具备刑事责任能力的人实施的信息网络知识产权违法行为、具备刑事责任能力人实施的达不到特定犯罪情节或者结果要求的信息网络知识产权违法行为等，均属于信息网络知识产权犯罪。不论是单纯实施为他人信息网络知识产权犯罪提供帮助的行为还是参与正犯行为，都应当遵循从一重罪处罚的法理。%In Crime of Providing Assistance for Network Crime, “knowledge” refers to only “full awareness” rather than “should know”. When determining “knowledge”, the means of criminal presumption applies to anyone but those who can prove with evidence that he/she does actually not know the aiding object committing the Crime of Infringing Intellectual Property Right on the Network. “Crime” hereof means the crime in the meaning of criminal behavior, rather than the crime in the meaning of possessing all constitutive elements. Therefore, “the Crime of Infringing Intellectual Property Right on the Network” includes committing illegal acts without criminal capacity which infringing intellectual property right on the network and performing unlawful act that fails to meet the requested specific criminal circumstances or criminal consequence and so forth. Whether purely providing assistance for the Crime of Infringing Intellectual Property Right on the Network or participating as a principal offender, these conducts should be bound by the principle of “giving severer punishment as one crime”.
展开▼
